Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sunday, 8 November 2009

Zardari phobia and hostile col-anchors

= See full size image



For years at least some of our anchors have claimed that the Mehsud militants are backed by foreign enemies of Pakistan. But neither the war in Waziristan nor the terrorist attacks in Rawalpindi have received the kind of attention that befits them. For the overzealous TV anchors, the real issue is how to embarrass President Zardari. Some of them claim they have the establishments backing in doing so. (Source)

Abbas Athar requests everyone to pray for the swift recovery of those col-anchors (pro-Taliban or pro-establishment) who are currently suffering from Zardari phobia.






In the words of Sadiq Saleem:
Those striving for a Constitutional knockout of President Zardari need to reconsider whether they will accomplish anything even if they succeed. The first consequence of such a knockout would be to give the PPP and the Bhutto-Zardari family the mantle of victimhood once again. After the initial grumbling is over, the People’s Party will most likely rally round the family that has given the greatest sacrifices for it. Even if Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani becomes part of the knockout plan, which is highly unlikely, he would be reduced to the same position as Farooq Leghari was within months of his action against Benazir Bhutto in 1996.

If the fingerprints of the establishment are found in President Zardari’s decapitation, as the anti-Zardari anchors and columnists claim, it would revive in all likelihood the anti-establishment polarization that the military sought to end by withdrawing from politics after the eclipse of General Pervez Musharraf. In any case, why should the establishment become part of an anti-Zardari game plan if all it would do is bring Mr Nawaz Sharif to power?

The issue of civil-military relations will certainly not be resolved to the establishments satisfaction because if Mr. Nawaz Sharif rises to power with the weakening of a Zardari-led PPP then he is unlikely to be more deferential to GHQ.

Since the unfortunate era of General Ziaul Haq the Pakistani establishment has had a pro-Jihad faction that operates politically through the media and various political actors. These people did not respect General Asif Nawaz, General Abdul Waheed, or General Jehangir Karamat. General Pervez Musharraf pleased them by championing adventurism in Kargil but lost their backing in the post-9/11 context. Now, too, it is not General Ashfaq Kayani who wants an army (or establishment) role in politics. It is the beneficiaries of Jihad Inc., including the many media figures beholden to the Jihadis, who want to shoot at a liberal government using the establishments shoulder.

If Pakistan will gain nothing from upsetting the applecart, why are some people so insistent on continuing to distract the nation from fighting terrorism and from sympathizing with terrorist victims? Why not allow the Parliament to decide matters even if it is with a single vote? Why don’t the TV anchors ask Imran Khan how he can judge the government’s actions and claim to speak for the people without being elected? Why is every initiative of PML-N a media initiative and never brought to the elected chambers? Is it not the purpose of democracy to find a way to get past issues instead of getting bogged down by them?

The media, especially its electronic manifestation, seems like a bunch of quacks (fake doctors) that keep generating campaign after campaign against someone they dislike (President Zardari). It is time the people fight back and say let there be some sanity in the country. Let priorities be priorities.

"Media Terminators" in Pakistan
By Tahir Sarwar Mir


Col-anchors will never raise the following issues (courtesy "revolution"):

Where are CJ Iftikhar Chauhary's famous suo moto actions?
Why is Amina Masood Janjua still standing outside Supreme Court Building?
Why no one got punished for November 3 and May 12 actions?
Why No suo moto against foreign interventions in Islamabad streets?

4 comments:

Agha H Amin said...

i am surprised that shaheen sehbai is doing this too.in 2003 he published my article on pakistans generals corruptio which was reprinted in PPP website also.

pakistan is an aundoubted failed state.

no NAB charges nawaz sharif for awarding lahore islamabad motorway contract to DAEWOO many days before last date of award of tender announced by govt of pakistan.

no punjabi court charged shahbaz sharif for awarding without bidding the 8 billion Rupees , 15 % higher than NESPAK estimate construction of lahore ring road to NLC who within 24 hours sub contracted it again to civilian contractors without bidding.

but we have yellow journalists of geo TV , ARY TV and so many others spreading disinformation against Zardari.

Ehtesab Bureau was Sindh specific and so was NAB.Musharraf might have been against Sharifs but the pakistani military and judiciary are punjabi patriots.Thus the minus one conspiracy to remove Zardari ! Zardari may be no angel but are nawaz sharif and shahbaz sharifs angels.

Its time that we re-name Pakistan Supreme Court and all state institutions as Punjabi Institutions.It would be a good idea to shift supreme court to Lahore.

If Punjabi can do no wrong and Sindhi and Baloch can do no right is the guiding principle of pakistans judiciary and army then Pakistan will not survive as a state.

Agha H Amin

http://low-intensity-conflict-review.blogspot.com/

Aamir Mughal said...

Hamid Nasir Chattha [Chaudhry Shujaat brother in Law]

On Feb 22, 2008 Former speaker and a key leader of the former ruling PML, Hamid Nasir Chattha who lost the National Assembly election but won a seat in the Punjab Assembly, also met Mr Zardari. PPP spokesman Farhatullah Babar told Dawn that Mr Chattha had come only to offer condolences to Mr Zardari over the assassination of Benazir Bhutto.[1]

Strange isn't it that Mr. Chatta is also a close relative Chaudhary Shujaat Hussain [PML-Q] and Chaudhary Parvez Ilahi [PML-Q].

Not in a very distant Past Mr Asif Ali Zardari [Co-Chairperson PPP] used to dub PML-Q as the "Qatil League," or the 'Killer League.' The implication was that the politicians allied to President General (R) Pervez Musharraf, were behind the assassination of the PPP chairperson Benazir Bhutto.[2]

As per Daily Time Dated Monday, December 31, 2007

"Zardari says PML-Q is ‘Qatil League’ [3]

So who will decide the definition of Qatil League. I leave it for you. You decide. Or is it that if any of the Q League leader comes to meet with Mr. Zardari then he/she is out of that Qatil definition.

References:

PPP-MQM embrace on the cards By Amir Wasim and Azfar-ul-Ashfaque [1]

February 23, 2008 Saturday Safar 15, 1429

http://www.dawn.com/2008/02/23/top3.htm

When politics becomes bitter Wild accusations and unbelievable promises are invariably made during election campaigns in Pakistan but these are difficult times for the country By Rahimullah Yusufzai [2]

http://jang.com.pk/thenews/jan2008-weekly/nos-13-01-2008/enc.htm#1

Zardari says PML-Q is ‘Qatil League’ [3]

Monday, December 31, 2007

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007\12\31\story_31-12-2007_pg1_2

Abdul Nishapuri said...

Thank you Agha Amin sahib for visiting LUBP. The only pathway to Pakistan's survival is a federation in which rights of all provinces, ethnicities and groups are respected and protected.

Aamir Mughal said...

Abdul, I second you on this.

Post a Comment

1. You are very welcome to comment, more so if you do not agree with the opinion expressed through this post.

2. If you wish to hide your identity, post with a pseudonym but don't select the 'anonymous' option.

3. Copying the text of your comment may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in posting.