Editor's Choice

Featured Post

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


Monday, 23 November 2009

Who needs an NRO ?

Posted by: Jarri Mirza
Blog post written by: Humza Ikram

Former Attorney general of Punjab"Khawaja Sharif" is trying to help his old master's boy, who was then Chief Minister Punjab "Nawaz Sharif".

Nawaz Sharif has really surprised his critics by playing his cards really smartly. First, he got a de-jure NRO from the establishment in a shape of Presidential Pardon and then negoiated an excellent business deal which resulted his safe exit to Saudi Arabia, where he owns one of the biggest Steel Mill of Asia and has expanded his other bussiness ventures. And now he got a de-facto NRO from the present judical setup, which is in fact an slap on recent Judicial Policy which aims to give verdicts within a time period six months.

published on 8th October, 2009 source: dailywaqt.com


Aamir Mughal said...

‘Former NAB chief removed to protect top politicians’ By Syed Irfan Raza Thursday, 26 Nov, 2009 http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/dawn-content-library/dawn/news/pakistan/06-former-nab-chief-removed-to-protect-top-politicians-rs-06

ISLAMABAD: Lt-Gen (retd) Shahid Aziz was removed from the post of chairman of the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) because he was about to expose names of top politicians involved in major scandals, informed sources told Dawn on Wednesday. They said the former NAB chairman was investigating involvement of some top politicians, including President Asif Ali Zardari, Mian Nawaz Sharif, Shahbaz Sharif, Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain and Humayum Akhtar in scams relating to sugar, edible oil, stock exchange and petroleum products. Lt-Gen Aziz, who appeared for the first time in the media since his removal from the NAB in 2006, told a private TV channel that he had been removed because he was investigating big scandals. ‘I was not allowed to work freely,’ said the former NAB chairman.

Gen (retd) Aziz is said to be related to former President Pervez Musharraf. ’Cases against President Asif Ali Zardari, Nawaz Sharif, Shahbaz Sharif, Chaudhry Shujaat, Humayun Akhtar and others were ripped but were closed,’ he said. 'In fact, NAB did not do itself any good when it quietly shelved its inquiry in March 2006 amid public accusations that most of those involved in the sugar crisis held important public positions, and hence got away with scandalous profiteering in such a sensitive food item as sugar.

‘I was asked that the prices of sugar, edible oil and petroleum products would go all time high if the investigation continued and faces behind the scams were exposed,’ Lt-Gen Aziz said.

In a report it presented before the Supreme Court recently, the NAB lent credence to rumours that blamed the sugar crisis of 2004-06 on top politicians. It has named Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Nawaz Sharif, Shahbaz Sharif, Asif Ali Zardari, Humayun Akhtar, Jehangir Tareen, Altaf Saleem, Nasarullah Dareshak, Anwer Cheema and Mian Azhar, who between them are alleged to have hoarded as much as 316,690 metric tons of sugar, pushing its price up from Rs21 to Rs45 per kg.

According to the NAB report, Humayun Akhtar, his brother Haroon Akhtar and their cousin Shamim were the biggest sugar hoarders with a consolidated stock of 99,464 metric tons at the Kamalia, Tandlianwala, Miran and Layyah mills. At the second position were the two Sharif brothers whose three mills stashed away 68,648 metric tons. However, the Sharif and Akhtar brothers have strongly rejected the allegations levelled against them in the NAB report.

Anonymous said...

So the National Reconciliation Ordinance (NRO) beneficiaries list comes out. The media is happy that those persons who enjoyed taking advantage of the NRO have light casted upon them, while the government is trying to push forward the argument of how they have respected the Supreme Court’s judgment and have publicized the list. It seems to be a win-win situation for all parties. But is it really? Calls for the resignation of ministries and portfolios have echoed from all corners. How has this zero-sum game turned into a finger-pointing-name-calling battle?


Post a Comment

1. You are very welcome to comment, more so if you do not agree with the opinion expressed through this post.

2. If you wish to hide your identity, post with a pseudonym but don't select the 'anonymous' option.

3. Copying the text of your comment may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in posting.