Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Monday, 2 March 2009

Palki Main Hoke Sawar Chali Re: Nawaz Sharif joins Qazi Hussain Ahmed



Palki Main Hoke Sawar Chali Re: Nawaz Sharif joins Qazi Hussain Ahmed's Palki of Long March.

IJI revived? ISI involved?

paalki mein ho ke savaar chali re
main to apane saajan ke dwaar chali re
koi rok sake to ...



.....


....

Sharif back in his mettle
By Murtaza Razvi
Friday, 06 Mar, 2009 (Dawn)

SO Nawaz Sharif hasn’t really come a long way off his beaten track of 1999, has he? He’s hobnobbing with old friends again in quarters that were discredited by the voters just a year ago. Thrown out by Dogar’s court, he’s gone back to plead his case in the Qazi court, as it were; or so his latest embrace of the Jamaat-i-Islami suggests.

And it’s not just for old times’ sake. He’s back in the rightist fold because that’s where his and Qazi’s inner convictions cross path. With this, the moral high ground that Sharif had earned with the electorate also comes crashing down. Only last year, his party was tipped for the first time as having graduated to a mainstream secular platform — away from the mullah and the military.

In its shortlived new incarnation, the PML-N got so much of the popular vote that it defied analysis. That could be because Sharif’s rhetoric and what he said he wanted out of politics was seemingly all so secular and closer to the people’s heart: ‘I’m in it for restoring to the people their rights, not for power.’ Unembellished by any ideological references, the message struck right home.

The tragedy is that even in its apparent wrongdoing, the PPP has been able to expose the true face of the old (read renewed) Sharif; someone who carried the stigma of having been hand-in-glove with rightist elements if that could ensure him his grip on power.

Sharif’s drift back to his natural allies of yore at a time when his growing admirers saw him as a changed, reformed politician, who had learnt the hard way, will do him little good. Henceforth his best hope will be that the Pakistan People’s Party continue to muck things up for him to re-emerge as an alternative in spite of his unchanged self.

The paradox in Sharif is that while he can’t help being himself, he aspires to go beyond himself — and fails. And then he wonders why very few people in the so-called right quarters have such little sympathy for him.

What he fails to understand is that the populist mantle he donned in the aftermath of Zardari’s backtracking on his undertakings could only remain popular if he stuck to his ground — the PML-N’s newfound identity that did not depend on support from the military or the mullah.

That same ground will now be seen by the voters as being sullied as Sharif reverts to rightist elements. Could liaisons with the military be far behind? This by no means is good news for the PPP-led coalition though. Already the government is reportedly planning to block the lawyers’ long march on Islamabad, due to start on March 12 from Lahore and culminate in a sit-in outside parliament.

Given the Jamaat’s and the PML-N’s participation in the rally, it is only a matter of time when the lexicon of the entire movement assumes an ideological, Islamist colour. There will soon be talk of the pious and the impious being pitched against one another, of good versus evil, of guardians of faith and the country pitted against godless traitors. No wonder western diplomats have remained wary of Sharif despite his predicament under the Musharraf regime, and despite repeated overtures made to woo them to Sharif’s cause.

Clearly, the West’s ‘misgivings’ of what they saw Sharif standing for will now be reinforced. It may be popular being anti-West in Pakistan but while doing so if a religious lexicon is invoked, it places one squarely in the wrong company. And that wrong company is that of the Islamists.

Even the most mainstream of religious politicians like Fazlur Rahman and Qazi Hussain Ahmed have shied away from condemning the Taliban movement in Swat, Waziristan and elsewhere, because deep down they have sympathy for these elements, which to many western diplomats in Islamabad translates into their having a soft corner for Al Qaeda.

Come to think of it, never have any of Pakistan’s religious politicians unequivocally condemned Al Qaeda. And guess what? Neither has Sharif. So this is the wrong company the Sharifs will now keep in their struggle against the PPP-led coalition and, admittedly, Zardari’s wrong way of governance.

God help Pakistan.

http://www.dawn.com/wps/wcm/connect/Dawn%20Content%20Library/dawn/the-newspaper/editorial/sharif+back+in+his+mettle

5 comments:

Naeem said...

lols bohat khoob

Rabia said...

well, PML-N supporters I have talked to are openly supporting the army forcing Zardari to resign after the long march (funny how they have no problem with that unconstitutional measure) in case a no-confidence motion fails.

So clearly this is no longer about opposing the army.

Shaheryar Ali said...

i have been writing and commenting everywhere long before BB's shahdat that its all a smoke screen. Establishment wants the clock to turn back to good old Jihadi days. PPP was the most popular party and it was not possible. They are making it un popular. Judicial issue was a start of it. Aitzaz , Iftikhar, Nawaz and Qazi they all were on the same boat.

Just wait n see. For those who have an empirical interest in history, just ponder on one issue.
Who were part of Nizam e Mustafa movement? , same as those in IJI, APDM and judicial movement the same Aitzaz Ahsans, communists [now civil society] PML, JI.

Rabia said...

Sheheryar,
what I can't understand is why HRCP, etc, are still going along with the lawyer's movement.

Abdul said...

Rabia, Sorry it seems Sherry din have a chance to read your question. IMHO HRCP etc are trying to balance their image in the eyes of the right-wing. What they might be overlooking is the fact that it is hard to appease the right-wing. In Arabic, there is a term 'hal min mazeed' or perhaps 'joo-a-l-baqar'; a never ending appetite.

Post a Comment

1. You are very welcome to comment, more so if you do not agree with the opinion expressed through this post.

2. If you wish to hide your identity, post with a pseudonym but don't select the 'anonymous' option.

3. Copying the text of your comment may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in posting.