Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Showing posts with label Butchery. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Butchery. Show all posts

Saturday, 22 August 2009

ISI is supporting "Good Taliban", leaving innocent people to Taliban's "mercy"


The following reports by BBC Urdu and Rediff suggest that the ISI is still active in its support of "Good Taliban".


’طالبان کی پشت پناہی نہ کی جاتی تو ان کا صفایا کر دیتے‘

سوات میں پاکستانی فوج

’فوج کو خبر ہونے تک طالبان گھر کا محاصرہ کر چکے تھے‘

پاکستان کے قبائلی علاقوں اور صوبہ سرحد میں پچھلے کئی سالوں سے جاری تشدد کی لہر نے نہ صرف لوگوں کے ذہنوں میں ملک کی ’سلامتی‘ کے بارے میں خدشات پیدا کیے ہیں بلکہ اس کی کھوکھ سے جنم لینے والے المیے متاثرہ افراد کی زندگیوں کے ساتھ ہمیشہ کے لیے نتھی ہو چکے ہیں۔ طالبان اور سکیورٹی فورسز کے مابین جاری لڑائی سے جنم لینے والے انسانی المیوں کے مختلف پہلووں کو صحافت کے تنگ دامن میں یا تو سرے سے جگہ ہی نہیں مل سکی اور اگر ملی بھی تو اس طرح نہیں جس طرح سے یہ واقعات رونما ہوئے اور یوں حقیقی کہانیاں صحافتی مقابلے کی دوڑ کے ملبے میں کہیں دفن ہوگئیں۔

پشاور میں بی بی سی کے نامہ نگار عبدالحئی کاکڑ جنگ زدہ افراد یا خاندانوں پر بیتی ہوئی انہی کہانیوں کی کھوج میں ہیں جنہیں بی بی سی اردو ڈاٹ کام ایک سیریز کی صورت میں شائع کر رہی ہے۔ اس سلسلے کی دوسری کہانی۔

کلِکجنگ کہانی: پہلی قسط

اکرام اللہ (فرضی نام)، گوالیرئی، تحصیل مٹہ، سوات

’’یہ چھبیس اکتوبر دو ہزار آٹھ کی صبح کا واقعہ ہے۔ گوالیرئی گاؤں کی مسجد میں ستر کے قریب مقامی قبائلی رہنما طالبان کے نمائندے ملا شمشیر کے ساتھ بات چیت کرنے کے لیے اکھٹے ہوئے تھے۔ مذاکرات کے دوران یہ طے پایا کہ طالبان آئندہ گاؤں میں داخل نہیں ہونگے البتہ انہیں سڑک پر سے گزرنے کی اجازت ہوگی اور مشران نے طالبان کی یہ شرط مان لی کہ وہ فوج سے ملاقات کرکے انہیں گاؤں میں آنے سے منع کریں گے۔ قرآن مجید کو گواہ بنا کر درمیان میں رکھا گیا اور ملا شمشیر نے آخری دعا کردی۔

دو دن بعد انہوں نے ہم میں سے دو مشران کوگولیاں ماردیں اور انہیں باہر بجلی کے کھمبوں پر لٹکادیا۔ بعد میں انہوں نے تین یرغمالی مشران کو اس شرط پر چھوڑ دیا کہ وہ گاؤں کے لوگوں کو طالبان سے راضی نامہ کرنے پر قائل کریں۔ مشران نے گاؤں جا کر لوگوں کے سامنے دامن پھیلا پھیلا کر انہیں طالبان سے صلح کرنے پر راضی کرا لیا۔

اکرام اللہ

دعا کے بعد ملا شمشیر باہر نکل گئے اور مشران فوجی حکام سے مذاکرات کا طریقہ کار طے کرنے میں مصروف ہوگئے کہ چند منٹوں کے بعد ملا شمشیر مسجد میں دوبارہ داخل ہوئے اور کہا کہ ’امیر صاحب آگئے ہیں وہ تم لوگوں سے کچھ کہنا چاہ رہا ہے‘۔ تھوڑی دیر بعد ابنِ یامین، خوگ، غزنوی نامی طالبان کمانڈر اپنے تیس کے قریب ساتھیوں کے ہمرا جوتوں کے ساتھ ہی مسجد میں داخل ہوگئے۔

ان کے پاس کلاشنکوفیں، جی تھری بندوقیں تھیں اور انہوں نے اپنے جسموں کے ساتھ گرینیڈ اور دیگردھماکہ خیز مواد باندھ رکھا تھا۔ ابن یامین نے داخل ہوتے ہی اپنے ایک رشتہ دار ایوب سپین دادا پر کلاشنکوف کا برسٹ چلا دیا۔اس کے ساتھ ہی طالبان نے جرگے پر اندھا دھند فائرنگ شروع کر دی۔ گولیوں کے شور میں کسی کی بھی آواز سنائی نہیں دے رہے تھی۔ جب فائرنگ میں کمی آئی تو میں نے دیکھا کوئی کراہ رہا ہے، کوئی مردہ حالت میں، کوئی مسجد کے ستون کے پیچھے چھپا اور بعض لوگ کسی کونے میں گھٹڑیوں کی صورت میں بیھٹے ہوئے ہیں۔اس موقع پر پانچ افراد ہلاک اور سات زخمی ہوگئے۔طالبان نے باقی لوگوں پر بندوقیں تان کر انہیں یر غمال بنایا۔

انہوں نے سپین دادا کے چھوٹے بھائی بہر مند خان کو قتل کرنے کے بعد پاؤں سے پکڑ کر باہر مسجد کی صحن میں پھینک دیا اور ان کے دوسرے بھائی بر کمال کو ابنِ یامین نے زندہ پکڑ کر ان سے کہا کہ ’وہ تم ہی تھے جس نے مجھے دھمکی دی تھی کہ میں تمھاری آنکھیں نکال دونگا‘۔ یہ کہنے کے بعد اس نے بر کمال کی آنکھوں پر کلاشنکوف کی نال رکھی اور دو برسٹ مار دیے۔

اس کے بعد طالبان نے اندر آکر ایوب سپین داد اور ایک اور قبائلی رہنما کی لاش اٹھائی اور ان کے ہاتھ پاؤں کاٹ کر انہیں باہر ایک درخت پر لٹکادیا۔ابھی ہم ساٹھ سے زائد لوگ اندر ہی یرغمال تھے کہ باہر سے شدید فائرنگ کی آوازیں آنے لگیں۔ ہمیں ڈر لگا کہ کہیں گاؤں والوں نے ہماری مدد کے لیے طالبان پر حملہ نہ کردیاہو۔ ہمیں خوف تھا کہیں طالبان ہم سب کو مار نہ دیں۔

گاؤں میں جو دس سے زائد لوگ طالبان کو مطلوب تھے ان پر ایک ایک لاکھ روپے یا ایک کلاشنکوف دینے کا جرمانہ عائد کیا گیا جو انہوں نے بعد میں ادا بھی کر دیا۔

اکرام اللہ

یہ سلسلہ دس سے ایک بجے تک جاری رہا۔ اس کے بعد طالبان ساٹھ سے زائد یر غمالی مشران کو اپنے ہمراہ لے گئے اور ہمیں گاؤں سے تقریباً دو کلومیٹر دور اغل نامی پہاڑی علاقے کی طرف لے گئے۔ وہاں پر ہمیں ایک سکول میں رکھا گیا۔ وہ ہر وقت ہمیں مارتے تھے۔ خوفزدہ کرنے کے لیے ہمارے سامنے چھریاں تیز کرتے اور آ کر کہتے آج اس کو اور کل فلاں کو ذبح کرنے کی باری ہے۔

دو دن بعد انہوں نے ہم میں سے دو مشران کوگولیاں ماردیں اور انہیں باہر بجلی کے کھمبوں پر لٹکادیا۔ بعد میں انہوں نے تین یرغمالی مشران کو اس شرط پر چھوڑ دیا کہ وہ گاؤں کے لوگوں کو طالبان سے راضی نامہ کرنے پر قائل کریں۔ مشران نے گاؤں جا کر لوگوں کے سامنے دامن پھیلا پھیلا کر انہیں طالبان سے صلح کرنے پر راضی کرا لیا۔

اس کے بعد ہمیں چھوڑ دیا گیا۔ گاؤں میں جو دس سے زائد لوگ طالبان کو مطلوب تھے ان پر ایک ایک لاکھ روپے یا ایک کلاشنکوف دینے کا جرمانہ عائد کیا گیا جو انہوں نے بعد میں ادا بھی کر دیا۔ جب ہم واپس آئے توگاؤں والوں نے بتایا کہ پہلے دن جب وہ جاں بحق ہونے والے افراد کو دفنانے میں مصروف تھے کہ فوجی ہیلی کاپٹروں نے آکر فائرنگ کی جس میں تین افراد زخمی ہوگئے۔ جو لوگ باقی میتوں کو غسل دینے میں مصروف تھے وہ بھی بھاگ گئے۔

ہمارے گاؤں کے قریب پیر سمیع اللہ کا گاؤں ہے۔ وہاں پر جب لوگوں کو پتہ چلا کہ گوالیرئی پر طالبان نے حملہ کردیا تو انہوں نے لشکر بنایا اور ہماری طرف روانہ ہوگئے لیکن جب انہوں نے گاؤں پر ہیلی کاپٹروں کو شیلنگ کرتے دیکھا تو وہ واپس لوٹ گئے۔

میں سمجھتا ہوں کہ اگر ہماری فوج اور خفیہ ادارے طالبان کی پشت پناہی نہ کرتے تو ہم سوات کے لوگ ان مٹھی بھر افراد کا صفایا کردیتے۔



The death of a 'bad Talib'



The death of Pakistan's Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud in an American drone attack has once again brought to the fore the differences between the 'good Taliban' and the 'bad Taliban'. Pakistan-based journalist Tahir Ali analyses the differences and conflicts within the Taliban, which is facing intensive military operations in both Afghanistan and Pakistan.

"The Taliban's Jihad against foreign forces in Afghanistan will not be affected if a Pakistani Taliban leader is killed on the other side of the Durand Line (which divides Afghanistan and Pakistan)," said Zabiullah Mujahid, the Taliban's spokesperson in Afghanistan, in the wake of reports that Pakistan Taliban chief Baitullah Mehsud was killed.

Zabiullah's assessment is right, as the death of Mehsud might be a big blow to the Tehrik-e Taliban Pakistan, but not to the Afghan Taliban.

There were differences of opinion between the chiefs of the Taliban in the two countries earlier. Mullah Omer, the head of Afghan Taliban, has good relations with some elements in Pakistan's Inter Services Intelligence and he doesn't want unrest in Pakistan.

But Baitullah Mehsud, along with his deputy Hakimullah Mehsud, carried out a number of attacks against ISI installations in Pakistan. Mehsud felt that there was no difference between the fight against Pakistani security forces and the fight against the forces of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation's forces in Afghanistan, as both are following same agenda.

His men preferred fighting in Pakistan instead of Afghanistan -- they termed Pakistani forces the 'near enemy' while NATO forces were branded the 'far enemy'.

Pakistani Taliban elements can be broadly divided into two groups, the 'good Taliban' and the 'bad Taliban'. A number of Pakistani politicians are of the view that Pakistan should promote the 'good Taliban' for its own interest rather than that of the United States.

'Good Taliban' are those who never target Pakistani armies and their focus remains on Afghanistan, while the 'bad Taliban' mainly attack Pakistani government installations and often seek refuge across the border.

The relations between the 'good Taliban' and the Pakistan government are based on the theory of 'mutual non-interference in each other's affairs'.

Qari Zainuddin Mehsud, the head of the anti-Baitullah group, is an example of this group. He enjoyed the support of state agencies, confronted Baitullah Mehsud and openly supported the Jihad in Afghanistan against NATO forces. However, Zainuddin Mehsud could not oppose Baitullah for a long time, as he was killed by his guard on June 23 this year.

Mullah Omer, one of the world's most wanted men, has good ties with Mullah Nazir, who has great influence over the agency's Wazir-dominated areas. South Waziristan is broadly divided into two parts -- Mehsud-built and Wazir-built. Mehsud is the largest tribe comprising 60 per cent of the population that lives in Sarokai, Kaniguram, Makin, Shakatoi and Sararogha, while 35 per cent of the populations is made up of Wazirs who are dominant in Wana, the headquarters of the agency, and its environs.

Mullah Nazir, a 'good Talib', enjoys good relations with the Pakistan government. His followers never attack security forces in the area and the army reciprocates by not disturbing his fighters while they cross the Durand Line. In 2006, Taliban forces in this part were also fighting against Pakistani security forces, under the leadership of commander Haji Omer, the cousin of slain Taliban commander Naik Muhammad.

Naik Muhammad had initiated an armed struggle against the Pakistani forces in South Waziristan. He later signed a peace agreement with the government but the accord was sabotaged when he was killed during a drone attack in 2004.

Haji Omer, popularly known for harbouring foreign militants, especially Uzbeks, succeeded Naik Muhammad. The aggressive Uzbeks carried out attacks against the security forces and local chieftains, which dampened the Taliban's popularity in the area. The Taliban elements in Afghanistan were concerned about this development, as they often crossed over to Pakistan, especially during winter.

When the public opinion against Haji Omer and the Uzbeks became stronger, Mullah Omer appointed Mullah Nazir, his blue-eyed boy, as the head of all Taliban factions in Wana and its surroundings. The newly appointed head of Taliban started cleansing operation against Uzbeks and their host Haji Omer -- they were ousted in March 2007.

Incidentally, Haji Omer and Uzbek militants were welcomed by Baitullah Mehsud, drawing the ire of both Mullah Omer and Mullah Nazir.

Hafiz Gul Bahadur, the head of the Taliban faction in neighbouring North Waziristan, follows a similar policy of opposing Jihad within Pakistan and focusing on the fight inside Afghanistan.
Gul Bahadur, a 'good Talib', enjoys the support of government agencies and of Mullah Omer. Maulana Sirajuddin Haqqani, the son of senior Afghan Jihadi Jalaluddin Haqqani, follows the same policy.

In 2006, when fighting erupted between Pakistani security forces and the Taliban at North Waziristan, Mullah Dadullah, a dreaded Afghan Taliban commander, brokered a peace deal between the two parties. Dadullah, who was killed later, wanted Waziristan to be a safe haven for Taliban fighters, and didn't want clashes with Pakistani security forces.

Gul Bahadur Wazir, the head of the Taliban in North Waziristan, initially fought against Pakistani security forces, but signed a peace deal with the government in 2006. However, in 2007, he broke the agreement, only to re-enter into a peace deal with the government. In June 2009, he again withdrew from the deal.

After Baitullah Mehsud's death, the state agencies are trying to create a rift in the Baitullah-led TTP, over the issue of leadership. State-owned media also carried some baseless reports that Hakimullah Mehsud and Waliur Rehman, both likely successors of Mehsud, have killed each other.

Some 'good Taliban' commanders, backed by Pakistani agencies, are trying to appoint some pro-government commander as the head of TTP. But members of the al-Qaeda and the Punjabi Taliban, who have good contacts with the TTP, have rushed to the area to appoint the new chief.
Hakimullah Mehsud is the strongest contender for the slot but Mufti Waliur Rehman is also not far behind in the race to succeed Baitullah.

According to a report, the ISI provided the Central Intelligence Agency with the requisite information needed to strike Baitullah Mehsud, as he was a 'bad Talib'. But will Pakistan help the CIA target other wanted militants, including Mullah Nazir, Hafiz Gul Bahadur or Sirajuddin Haqqani, who are considered 'good Talibans'?


Source

Some relevant comments:

A view for the USA

The Pakistani ISI and military want the Taliban as clients, not the other way around. There are, reportedly, plenty of convinced Islamists in uniform, but Pakistan's national objectives are all about India (as they always have been) and suppressing terrorism within Pakistan itself. This is new. The Pakistani Taliban's violent subversion in Pakistan has compromised what had been a long sponsorship of radical Islamist groups by the Pakistani security services. With Musharraf having put Kashmir on the back burner and the Americans in Afghanistan, the more bloodthirsty Islamists have seen the seizure of more territory in Pakistan itself as their best option.

It's hard to tell how much that has been changed by the Pakistani army's offensive in Swat and American decimation of factional Islamist leadership. Having said that, what I'd expect the Pakistani security services to do in response to an American withdrawal from Afghanistan is the reverse of Lindholm's prediction; they'd negotiate with Taliban factions to desist from further adventures within Pakistan in exchange for support of their effort to regain power in Afghanistan, and to take their al Qaeda "guests" with them. In brief, they'd seek to export their terrorism problem.

A Taliban movement exercising de facto control over much of the Pashtun-majority areas of Afghanistan but purged of al Qaeda elements can't be said to threaten our security. Taliban hosting al Qaeda elements who never leave Afghanistan are no threat either. It's a Taliban receiving intelligence and logistical support from Pakistan's security services, controlling Afghan territory and hosting al Qaeda elements able to use it as a sanctuary, coming and going as they please that we cannot permit. A military coup in Pakistan wouldn't be required for such a situation to arise.


Read more...

Wednesday, 11 February 2009

Poland cancels visit of Pakistan senators. Polish officials charged that elements within the Pakistani government shared blame for the killing.

Daily Express...



Poland cancels visit of Pak senators

* Offers $290,000 bounty for killers of Polish hostage

WARSAW/ISLAMABAD: Poland’s Senate on Tuesday called off a visit by Pakistani senators after their country’s negotiators failed to save Polish hostage Piotr Stanczak from execution by his Taliban captors.

The delegation had been due to visit Warsaw from February 12 to 14, according to a statement by the Polish Senate, AFP reported.

Polish officials charged that elements within the Pakistani government shared blame for the killing, AP reported.


Pakistan’s top diplomat in Poland rejected the accusation that members of the Islamabad government were sympathetic to extremists. Meanwhile, the government on Tuesday stopped a four-member Senate delegation from proceeding to Poland after the Polish Senate called off their visit. Senate Secretary Raja Amin said the visit was postponed on Monday evening.

Bounty: Also on Tuesday, the Polish government offered $290,000 reward for information leading to the capture of Taliban who had beheaded Stanczak. agencies/zulfiqar ghuman

http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009\02\11\story_11-2-2009_pg1_5


Warsaw/Islamabad, Feb. 11 (ANI): Polands Senate has called off a visit by Pakistani senators after Pakistan failed to save Polish hostage Piotr Stanczak from execution by his Taliban captors.

The delegation was due to visit Warsaw from February 12 to 14, according to a Polish Senate statement, the Daily Times reported.

Polish officials have accused some elements within the Pakistan Government of being sympathetic to the Taliban.

Pakistans top diplomat in Poland, however, had rejected the charge.

Islamabad on Tuesday stopped the four-member Senate delegation from proceeding to Poland.

The Polish government had offered a 290,000-dollar bounty for information leading to the capture of Taliban who beheaded Stanczak. (ANI)

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/south-asia/poland-asks-pak-team-not-to-visit_100153778.html
Read more...

Thursday, 25 December 2008

Jihadi and Jasoosi cocktail in Pakistan - By Hasan Mujtaba; Also comments on the movie "The Convoy of Death"

An interesting piece on Mullah Military Alliance (ISI-Jihadi Alliance) in Pakistan.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/miscellaneous/story/2008/12/081223_hasan_column_sen.shtml

Some Comments:

These comments are in the context of a movie "The Convoy of Death" - produced and directed by Irish filmmaker and former BBC producer Jamie Doran, the film tells the story of thousands of prisoners who surrendered to the US military’s Afghan allies after the siege of Kunduz. According to the film, some three thousand of the prisoners were forced into sealed containers and loaded onto trucks for transport to Sheberghan prison. When the prisoners began shouting for air, U.S.-allied Afghan soldiers fired directly into the truck, killing many of them.

death_wave Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 6:54 am
comment-top

it showed the true face of americans. veitnam, korea, iraq, afghanistan…these buthcers hav left a trail of blood n death wherever they hav gone and on top of tht they put other countries on human rights watch list…bloody jokers…

mengal Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 11:54 am
comment-top

What were all these Pakistani taliban doing over there. Were they on a tourist or a business trip. Perhaps they were also the merchandisers of death.

......

innsider Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 2:01 pm
comment-top

NO IDEA,why we are fighting others war on our soil.and trying to portray afghans as our friends.all the contracts between americans and afghans sighned in white house.we must leave them to decide by themselves.
we are not contractor of islam in the region.afghans ,arabs have NO sympathies for pakistan at all.even zia ul haq &army imported millions of afghans into pakistan for their own interests.their charecter is shameful.afghans knows only one language,that is Dollars,by any means,heroine,weapons of all kind etc.just pay them,they will do,whatever they want.
its a matter between “Bin LA deen” & afghans.
we are already paying the price of that muslim brotherhood.
we are not champion of islam.every palestinian iraqi,chechan,afghans,etc trying to use us.why?
many on this forum trying to prove themselves patriotic OR voice of so called muslim

....

Ghost of TK Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 4:19 pm
comment-top

@death_wave: “these buthcers hav left a trail of blood n death wherever they hav gone”

All the more reason for us to NOT play little piThThoos in their hands. And I’m talking starting in 1958 (not just 1979 and 2002) — Our Beardo friends have selective memories when it comes to the heinous crimes committed by America all through it’s history.

They supported the very same America as the ‘godly’ state against the ‘godless’ Russians (I guess because they were orthodox not Protestant?)

Now they scream bloody murder when America does what it has ALWAYS done (and in cahoots with it’s handmaiden the Pakistan Army i might add!) to them! the blue eyed boys of the enchanted decade that was the AFghan Jihad!

If anyone had tried to tell the beardo’s in the 80’s that Americans were heinous war criminals, they would have labelled him/her as “anti pakistan”, “india ka ajunT”, “Khilaaf-e-Islam” and god knows what else. Ignorance is bliss I guess, until you get a rude wakeup call.

God indeed is just!

.......

niazbhatti Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 5:53 pm
comment-top

Not only Americans who are responsible for this, you very own Muslim Pakistani army is committing same level of atrocity on behalf of Americans, as their mercenary force, with its own people.
If Gen. Dostum and “Gen” Bush should be brought to justice then Gen. Mush & his ghunda army should also be treated accordingly.


....

jazoo Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 8:09 pm
comment-top

My heartiest congrets to all non beardos for showing sub human insensitivity & cruel response to inhumane treatment of some human being also known as Taliban.
All of these imbeciles are acting like God, judging & justifying the cruel treatment because Taliban did this & Taliban did that.
Taliban off course were atrocious but look at those 19 & 20 years old innocent faces–they might be ignorant but they happened to be at the most backward & illiterate part of the world where basic & elementary education is considered University Degree–What options they had but to join Taliban.
Punishment should be given to those who were founder of Taliban(ISI,USA,CIA,Neocon) but tragically founder of Taliban were behind these tragedies & mere stooges were the brunt of this cruel joke.
I thought Ghost is a good human being, he will feel the pain of human misery but that beardo thing has got into his senses & had impaired his power of judgment.
Shirkuh think balance stance is a must–taking side with an issue will compromise his intellectual reputation.
We are human being this is the case of human misery–regardless of which side we are & how intellectual we feel about ourselves, we should treat it as case of humanity–they feel the same pain we do–they are not made of rubber.

......

Ghost Of TK Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 8:20 pm
comment-top

Look at these 10-15 year old child soldiers being presented as “Taliban Heroes” …

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TePydYXTWS0

Would it not be better if these kids had books instead of guns in their hands.

We are being pushed to civil war. To destroy another Muslim nation. The onus is on BOTH parties to avert that possibility.

.....

Ghost of TK Says:
December 25th, 2008 at 11:50 pm
comment-top

@Traffic (nick name of a bastard sectarian person): “who gives a f0ck what jinnah was or what he wanted”

This pretty much sums up the beardo mentality. Who indeed. Maybe Jinnah himself who seems to contradict your hallucinations about Pakistan being an “Islamic” state. Islamic as defined by some arbitrary beardo.

You seem to assume a lot of things. At least I do not support the American presence in Afghanistan or Iraq or any fucking country including Pakistan. But that fact you conveniently ignore. Similarly, every people have a right to self defense, I supported that in the Soviet Invasion and I support that now. So, READ MY LIPS: Afghans have the right to resist foreign invaders, manipulators and intriguers and to evict them. This includes but is not limited to the so called “Internation Security Assistance Force”

That doesn’t mean that I support a free for all on Pakistani territory. A free-for-all which includes running dumbass jihadi camps against every single neighbour of the State of Pakistan. Including China. What the fuck is wrong with the beardo’s. If they love the state and well-being of Pakistan so much, would they go so far as supporting the US/UK supported Uigher movement in china?

The fact is that they are numbnuts! And don’t understand what the hell they’re doing and that relates directly back to their abysmal ignorance of world affairs.

Like a bull in a bullfight, they only see the red-curtain of JEEHAAWD, and they Charge!

Now, is the way in which our venerable Army dealing with the FATA issue correct? NO! But these are the same dipshits who the beardo’s connived with and the same dipshits who created the proxy fighter forces to begin with.

Don’t blame the Nationalist Left for your retarded choices. You helped them every step of the way, and now they’re raping you. Well, enjoy the ass-shafting. Now you know how it feels hahaha!

And beardo’s have the nerve to call their opponent’s reasoning muddled and confused when it is they who on one hand condone the beheading of the Pakistani soldiers (THE symbols and last remaining piller of Pakistani STATE) in FATA, but they accuse others of “treachery” when others doubt the intentions of the very same army.

Consistency is not something that one should expect only from one’s opponents.

.......

Ghost of TK
Says:
December 26th, 2008 at 11:04 pm
comment-top

@Traffic:

I see that you (like most Beardo’s) have a problem with nuance. Unfortunately, It’s not my job to re-educate the likes of you. I can give you a sincere ‘mashwara’ and that is to get your head out of your ‘navel’ and smell the gunpowder and read something other than Jamat ‘litrature’.

Everything is black and white. Either it is jihad or it is kufr. There is no ‘in-between’ no “nuance” no nothing. This is what happens when you think with your beard and not with your brains.

Also, shouldn’t you be rushing to the front with your suicide-jacket? Since you and your ilk don’t tire of making excuses for blowing oneself up (for Islam of course!)

Or are you and your fake-a$$ Islamo-CosPlayers just going to sit around and do the things you spend time opposing … things like you know… using your pen to fight the war.

Funny you should follow the “Baboos” when it suits your self-preservation purpose. ;)

...



On the one hand they cry themselves hoarse over “the state” killing their ‘innocent taliban’ but when someone points out the serious problems with the Pakistani State, these fools call them ‘traitors’. The problem is, they don’t understand what ‘State’ means, what “Nation” is etc. etc. And it’s no big secret… all you have to do is close down your “howdoIblowmyselfup.com” page for a second and check out an online dictionary.

so, let’s see. If “the state” ie;the army is shoving it’s boot up YOUR behind, they are bad, worth blowing to bits with european-made RDX, slaughtering like animals, NO REGARD for the Pakistani State then!!!

But if someone from the left (and don’t bundle the douchebags who supported Moshe/Army with the left — shows how ill-educated and ill-advised you are) says something against the Army, they’re traitors.

Not only that, their crime is worse than beheading a company of Pakistani Army Soldiers.

Perspective? Naah! who needs perspective and nuance when you got a DeRh foot long beard!

..



Oh and btw, it was a baboo who made this Pakistan you beardo’s can’t stop ‘owning’.

It was a baboo who had the vision to start the nuclear program!

And now, the beardo’s who spent the last 50 years being America and CIA’s B!TCH have the nerve to come and open their beaks about ‘baboos’ not saying something positive about the nukes.

WE MADE THE FUCKING NUKES!

You’e just PROUD of them… still not educated enough to handle a knob though… but who cares, when you can pull the trigger of a chinese made ak-47 filled with indian made bullets riding in a japan made Toyota v8.

Some jihad! Some Mujahids! Some Dogs! Some Dog handlers! Long live the CIA-Beardo alliance.

Does that mean Afghans didn’t have the right to self defense? FVCK NO!! but who cares if one misses such a minor detail while jacking off to Jihadi Jermans blowing themselves up!

..

Traffic Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 1:04 am
comment-top

it seems the baboos still dont understand what their species consists of and why they have been labelled baboos on this forum. they think wearing Western clothes and speaking english makes one a baboo, and hence they call jinnah a Baboo as well. on the contrary Babooness is a disease in the mind which your lot suffer from. you guys are a very tiny minority which makes a lot of noise and gets a lot of exposure, dont bracket all decent Western dressed and english speaking people as baboos. jinnah would shudder at the thought of him being bracketed in the same lot as the pathetic self-pitying, inferiority complex suffering, ethnic-minded, anti-state and anti-Islam low-lifes as the baboos on this forum.


..

Ghost Of TK Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 1:17 am
comment-top

@Traffic: Don’t you have to go blow yourself up somewhere in your “blessed” jee-had?

Your obsession with baboos seems unhealthy.

happy detonating! Don’t forget to recite the Kalima. You Super Muslim!


...

Marcvs_Tacitvs_Cicero Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 1:40 am
comment-top

@Trafukc

I see you are still running your mouth on and on about this zoological discovery you seem to have made. Sadly, I realize that this is important to you and we are bound to suffer through more of your verbal and emotional diarrhea on this subject. But, mind you, your beard is spotted with spittle as you ramble on and on and on. I suggest you wipe it when you pause to take a breath.

I just stopped to give a little hint to ya: Your self-conscious attempts at proving yourself more erudite than everyone else or more patriotic or more religious or more whatever the fudge you think makes you so special, are wearing a little thin.

I also pause to notice that you are having some difficulty putting your finger on this “baboos” you so despise. Let me give you a hand (or a finger):

Baboo = Everyone who ever made poor Trafukc feel small. Everything that defeated poor Trafukc in life and love. Everyone taller than Trafukc. Everyone with better hygiene. Everyone without body odor.

“Yessss…Trafukc hates the clean-shaven ones. They betrayed us. Wicked. Tricksy, False. We ought to wring their filthy little necks. Make them grow beardsss and wear shalwarsss! And then, and then, and then, WE CALL THEM BABOOS… and we be the master!”

Get to the fugging point. Enlighten us. What is to be the panacea, what is to be the solution you propose for all the ills of the fatherland.

......

Ghost Of TK Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 1:52 am
comment-top

BTW, nice try in the lame effort at co-opting Bhutto! Beardo’s have no shame. First they call it “Khilaf-e-Islam”, Call a person Kaafir, and then when defeated by them, them, they say “we were with them all along!”

Perfect definition of Munafiqs. Becaues Beardo is a synonym for Munafiq.


...

Ghost Of TK Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 1:58 am
comment-top

@MTC: hahaha! classic! You hit the nail right on the head with Traffic … rest assured, beardo’s never have any solution (that don’t involve blowing oneself up or falling on one’s own dagger)

Now Jinnah is their hero, then Pakistan was a bad Idea and Jinnah was kaffir.

gimme a break!

..

Traffic Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 2:29 am
comment-top

i just noticed something funny. @TK started off by saying he wouldnt make fun of anyone who would say he was a “beardo”. well no-one did lol. then he tried to rename baboo brigade as the “nationalistic left”. when that didnt work either he not only admitted he is a baboo but also said that pakistan was made by a baboo and we baboos made the nukes. hahaha what a jerk!


...

baboos have a very bad habit of assuming stuff and generalizing things. for example baboo TK assumes that i labelled jinnah a kafir, or that i support his being labelled a kafir. and this other baboo who feels he has achieved something by twisting the word traffic is ranting about nothing, and he has nothing to say except make fun of beards, all the while assuming that i have a beard, so ill just ignore the c*nt.

...

Marcvs_Tacitvs_Cicero Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 2:53 am
comment-top

@TK

Boy, what did you do to this poor hurt little puppy…haha

He is acting like a jilted girlfriend with his “he said, I said” and “assuming, generalizing”…

wo aisi waisi larki nai hai

...

hraza123 Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 5:13 am
comment-top

Taliban were created by Pak Army, and since there was so moral base for their creation, everyone associated with them will suffer a fate like this.

As long as this report is concerned, I wish that a report for the masacre of Bamiyan should also emerge. Taliban vultures masacred 7000 people in one week’s time and no one spoke a word about it. Just because Afghanistan was a closed chapter for the west at that time.

What a hypocrat media..
I pray for the early destruction of Pak Army, and its Establishment. God bless the people of Pakistan as they’re inocent.


...

Says:
December 27th, 2008 at 10:11 am
comment-top

@Marcvs_Tacitvs_Cicero:

Looks like the brolls (Bearded Trolls) are taking it rather hard. I just hope, for @traff*k’s sake that he knows how to make “hate websites” … ;-)

Very typical of Beardo-Halwaists, they talk big, about morality, and jihad and all kinds of good stuff… they wouldn’t let anyone get a word in edgewise with their lectures to us ‘low-lifes’ in between their bong-hits (they’d have to be HIGH not to make sense so spectacularly!), but when the time comes to actually do something, they whine like little b!tches that they really are.

They have no problem sending off 2000 ill-equipped, under-age, rag-tag men who have fantasies of jihadi-grandeur to their doom and these NITWITS think that they are witnessing a rewind of ‘Badr’.. they get all moistened at the thought of how those 2000 ill-informed men will take over Kabul and raise the black flag of Islaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaam over .. I dunno… is there a building left standing in Kabul? ;)

But when their laziness, illiteracy and ill-preparedness catches up to the 2000 cannon-fodder, these very-same faux-mujahids, taking a break from another hasheesh session, decry the CRUEL AND UNJUST WEST! The BABOOS (who they themselves can’t define… but whatever)… THE VIOLATIONS OF GENEVA CONVENTION !!!!

All of a sudden, our fearsome jihadi’s are nothing more then head-severing valley girls:
“Umm… OMiGAWWD!! fighting jihad is like…umm…totally hard and stuff!”

All of a sudden, their little phantasy has gone from ‘Badr’ to ‘Karbala’, them staying safely tucked in their couches all this time, exhorting others to send their underage children not to school but to some beardo’s Suicide Bomber clearing house.. (of which there aren’t many… so it’s all ok)

All these Muslo-Fanatics, the Pseudo-Jihadi’s called @pejamistri names, without blinking or batting an eye, but when someone even hints at contorting their prissy little nick, they get all riled up and start calling the United Nations for mediation.

What a sorry lot indeed.

......
Read more...

Saturday, 25 October 2008

Swat: A Police Officer Slaughtered; Taliban's spokesperson accepts the responsibility. Shame on you Imran Khan and Hamid Gul.

Spokesperson of Taliban/Al-Qaeda/Sipah-e-Sahaba, Muslim Khan, has accepted the responsibility of slaughtering the personnel of Pakistan's security forces (police, FC, Army) in Swat.

What do Imran Khan and Hamid Gul say about this acceptance of responsibility by the Taliban?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2008/10/081025_swat_securityman_bodies.shtml
Read more...

Tuesday, 21 October 2008

A snapshot of Taliban's brutalities in Pakistan - BBC Blog by Arif Shamim

In his latest blog on BBC Urdu dot com, Arif Shamim shows and comments on the real picture of Taliban. Will the supporters of Taliban (Imran Khan, Hamid Gul, Mushtaq Minhas etc) still remain in the state of denial? or attribute the atrocities of our indigenous ISI made Talibans to other countries such as the USA and India?

Taliban ka jo yaar hay, ghaddar hay ghaddar hay

Ghaddaron ko, phaansi do

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/urdu/2008/10/post_357.html

People are happy on both sides of the border.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/india/story/2008/10/081021_kashmir_trade_resume_np.shtml
Read more...

Saturday, 4 October 2008

Taliban are funded by Islam's and Pakistan's enemies; their supporters in Pakistani media & politics are agents of Pakistan's enemies. By Abbas Ather

By Abbas Ather

Read this column; Taliban drink alcohol; they take money and weapons from Pakistan's enemies to conduct suicide operations against innocent Pakistani and foreign citizens in Pakistan. This group does not represent Islam. Pakistan's war against Taliban and Al-Qaeda is in fact Islam's war against terrorists. Long live martyrs (shaheed) of Pakistan Army and Pakistan Policy. Terrorists and their supporters, go to hell, sooner than later. And yes, take Imran Khan and Hamid Gul along with you. We, poor Pakistanis, had enough of them already.


[1100493880-2.gif]
Read more...

Imran Khan, Hamid Mir, Ansar Abbasi, and other supporters of Taliban, read this column...

Imran Khan says: Terrorist activities in Pakistan are a reaction to the USA and Pakistan's military action in FATA. Really? What about those people whose dear and nears ones were killed or injured in suicide bombings in Islamabad, Wah Cantt, D.I. Khan, Lahore, Quetta, Peshawar and Karachi? Who should they react against? Perhaps, they need to react against Taliban as well as their supporters? Read on...

[col14.gif]
Read more...