Editor's Choice

Featured Post

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


Thursday, 15 January 2009

“Musharraf personally believed that there were many good Taliban who should be co-opted in the post-Taliban power dispensation in Afghanistan”...

Pakistan torn over how to handle Taliban

* Analyst says Islamabad’s Taliban policy has suffered from indecisiveness, inconsistency and ambiguity

ISLAMABAD: After years of allowing Taliban to operate in the Tribal Areas, Pakistan is now torn over how to respond to the United States’ calls for a decisive action against the extremists.

Islamabad is under intense pressure from Washington, other western nations and Kabul to eliminate Taliban and Al Qaeda havens in the tribal belt, from where fighters are said to stage attacks on foreign forces in Afghanistan.

But experts say Pakistan’s desire to please the US, a vital political and military ally, has run up against its own strategic interests in the region and its loyalty to Pashtuns, the predominant ethnicity among the Taliban.

Policy: “Pakistan’s Taliban policy has suffered from indecisiveness, inconsistency and ambiguity,” political analyst Hasan Askari told AFP.

“Pakistan’s choices will become tougher in the future because its efforts to control the Taliban do not enjoy support throughout the society. A good number of ordinary people see India as more of a threat than the Taliban.”

“Pakistan did not want to sever all of its links with the Taliban movement, as doing so would have Pakistan totally out of the regional power game in Afghanistan,” defence analyst Riffat Hussain told AFP.

Fugitive Taliban leader Mullah Omar is still widely believed to be hiding in the Tribal Areas.

“Tens of thousands of Taliban poured into Pakistan’s northwest and southwest but security forces were under strict orders only to arrest Al Qaeda members,” a senior security official with knowledge of counterterrorism policy told AFP.

Hussain, head of strategic studies at Quaid-e-Azam University in Islamabad, said former military ruler Musharraf, who resigned last year, had two reasons for tolerating the Taliban presence on Pakistani soil.

“Musharraf personally believed that there were many good Taliban who should be co-opted in the post-Taliban power dispensation in Afghanistan,” Hussain said.

Islamabad also wanted an ‘insurance policy’ against the US-backed government of Afghan President Hamid Karzai, which it viewed as hostile, he added.

Another security official said that barring the Taliban from Pakistani soil would have angered the Pashtuns at home, saying: “Antagonising them completely is against our long-term national interest.”

But putting up with the Taliban was a risky policy. Groups — such as that of renegade warlord Baitullah Mehsud, believed to have masterminded the assassination of former premier Benazir Bhutto — are now allied with the Al Qaeda network.k.

“For years Pakistan targeted Al Qaeda and tolerated the Taliban, but this policy has failed and resulted in making the Taliban a strong force not just in Afghanistan, but in many parts of Pakistan,” a top security official told AFP.

“Pakistan will be asked to become the anvil for the hammer of American special forces operations in the Tribal Areas,” Hussain said, predicting that Islamabad could be asked to stage a joint anti-terrorist operations with the US.

Askari agreed, but said Islamabad would ask Washington to put a stop to attacks on Taliban targets in the border zone by unmanned CIA aircraft because ‘they create credibility problems’ for the Pakistani government.

Pakistan faces a double challenge — controlling the Taliban in the Tribal Areas and containing militant groups based in mainland Pakistan,” Askari said..

“Unless there is a simultaneous development of internal stability in Afghanistan and Pakistan, the problem may not be addressed.” afp (Daily Times)

No comments:

Post a Comment

1. You are very welcome to comment, more so if you do not agree with the opinion expressed through this post.

2. If you wish to hide your identity, post with a pseudonym but don't select the 'anonymous' option.

3. Copying the text of your comment may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in posting.