Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cricket. Show all posts

Tuesday, 8 September 2009

What lesson can Pakistan learn from the way Sri Lanka has dealt with the terrorism of LTTE


General Beg’s mess

Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani has stated that Sri Lankan President Mahinda Rajapakse, during a recent meeting in Libya, told him that “elements in Sri Lanka could be linked to incidents of terrorism in Pakistan, including the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore”. Both countries were now looking into “reports that terrorists in Pakistan had received finances from Sri Lanka,” Mr Gilani said on Sunday.

It should be remembered that Sri Lanka, subject to terrorism over decades, had always adopted a posture of “understanding” towards terror-stricken Pakistan. Despite the fact that world cricket was reluctant to visit Pakistan, Sri Lanka had sent its national team on a tour to Pakistan. The gesture was more in line with the thinking that terrorism should not disrupt normal links between countries. This was how Sri Lanka wanted the world to treat Pakistan.

The world knew the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) as a terrorist organisation but full information about its international activities was known only to think tank experts and the Sri Lankan government. Because at one level it was also an India-Sri Lanka issue, much of the global terrorist spread of the LTTE was obfuscated. However, it was by and large accepted by all that Al Qaeda had benefited from the “technology levels” available in LTTE’s capacity to inflict damage.

For instance, a report posted on the US Council on Foreign Relations website asserts that “the secular, nationalist LTTE has no operational connection with al-Qaeda, its radical Islamist affiliates, or other terrorist groups”. It does however accept that Al Qaeda copied the Tigers’ innovation of the “jacket” apparatus worn by individual suicide bombers. LTTE did do some training in Palestine and inspire copycat terrorism in Myanmar, Thailand, and Cambodia.

But Sri Lankan scholars have gone deeper into the LTTE activities than non-Sri Lankans. For instance, Shanaka Jayasekara, Terrorism Researcher, Centre for Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism (PICT), Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia, has zeroed in on the “contact” that no one talks about in Pakistan. He writes:

“Brian Joyce in an article in the Jane’s Intelligence in November 2002 on Terrorist Financing in South Asia states that the LTTE shipping fleet provided logistics support to Harkat-al Mujahideen, a Pakistani militant group with Al Qaeda affiliations, to transport a consignment of weapons to the Abu Sayyaf Group (ASG) in the Philippines. The LTTE used a merchant vessel registered by a front company in Lattakia, Syria, until 2002”.

Pakistan’s own intelligence may not have been very successful in finding the connection — our old spooks now singing on TV are more interested in fighting Mossad and RAW — but there has been a constant buzz in Pakistan about the Taliban and its patron Al Qaeda taking whatever money comes their way to inflict damage on Pakistan. Foreign countries and their intelligence agencies have been often named to explain the holding power of the Taliban.

Foreign terrorists too have been reported as a part of the baggage unloaded by Al Qaeda on its minions in South Waziristan. Even warlord Fazlullah in Swat was allowing “foreigners” to fight the Pakistan Army and behead innocent local people. It is therefore not beyond the Taliban — whose side-business is nothing but extortion and killing for profit — to do “the job” for the LTTE in Lahore for money.

The attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team was carried out by Lashkar-e-Jhangvi of the Taliban Tehreek Punjab, the most allied of Al Qaeda allies in the country. An officer of the Punjab police had however blamed India once again for the act of terrorism, assigning to New Delhi the motive that could very well be the motive of elements in Tamil Nadu that support the LTTE, and probably of the ruling political party of Tamil Nadu presently in Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s coalition at the centre.

Perhaps the most meaningful lesson for Pakistan to draw comes from the way Sri Lanka has dealt with the terrorism of LTTE. It tackled the long-term Indian involvement inside Sri Lanka on behalf of the nationalists of Tamil Nadu by “normalising” its relations with New Delhi, signing a free-trade treaty with it, and then confronting an increasingly isolated LTTE and putting an end to it. (Daily Times)


Read more...

Wednesday, 25 March 2009

Cricket, Pavilion and Punjab - Tahir Sarwar Mir's analysis of the Long March and Nawaz Sharif's politics

Express, 25 March 2009


The frustrated of the long march - Latif Chaudhry
Express, 25 March 2009


Read more...

Friday, 13 March 2009

Munir Attaullah: Conspiracy. Will anyone tell me who these terrorists are?

http://gamyhan.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/conspiracy.jpg

Conspiracy! —Munir Attaullah

It is clear that everyone, inside and outside Pakistan, particularly RAW, is conspiring against us. But what is so disheartening is that, in spite of such certain knowledge, our destiny is to be victims

The simpleton that I am, all my life I have suffered from the delusion that the obvious was also the most likely; that possibilities are endless; but to think in terms of probabilities, more productive.

How naïve and foolish of me! As some of those brilliant analytical minds that regularly guide the nation with their wonderfully deep insight continuously remind us, there is always more than meets the eye. So, apparently, my perspective just has to be all plain wrong.

Accordingly, doubting my own initial but obvious conclusions about who the perpetrators of the terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan team could be, I decided to seek guidance from people who know better. But I had a problem. I am your Average Joe, not important enough to have direct access to these experts on Ilm-al-Ghaib.

So what should I do? I will take refuge in what the scientific community calls a ‘thought experiment’.

ME: “Can anyone help me understand what is going on?”

THE CHORUS: “No doubt about it. It is a conspiracy. It is a conspiracy because it has to be a conspiracy. It has to be a conspiracy because it must be a conspiracy. And it must be a conspiracy because everything that happens anywhere is a conspiracy, particularly against the ummah. What’s more, it is a dastardly conspiracy, whatever that may mean. The bottom line is that even if it appears not to be a conspiracy, it obviously is a conspiracy.”

ME: “But what about ‘facts’, gentlemen? What if they make your theory far-fetched?”

Q SAHIB: “Facts? Are they not manufactured by the conspirators to disguise their true intentions and mislead innocent and pious Muslims? Our Zionist, American, and Hindu enemies are devilishly smart. Have they not successfully suppressed the undisputable fact that America and Mossad were behind 9/11? Did not RAW callously use its own agents, disguised as Pakistanis, for the Mumbai attacks?”

ME: “But our government says there is proof that Kasab is a Pakistani, his handlers were Pakistani, and the terrorists set sail from Karachi.”

D&G (sorry, I mean Generals B&G): “Rubbish; total fabrication. The only thing that is clear is that Kasab has been brainwashed by RAW, after his capture by them a few years ago in Afghanistan, to become a double agent and do their bidding, blah, blah, blah. We mean RAW! RAW! RAW!”

ME: “Any proof of that assertion?”

B&G: “You must be an American agent to ask such silly questions. Sophisticated conspirators do not leave proof behind.”

CHORUS: “Conspiracy! Conspiracy! Conspiracy!”

ME: “Can we get back to the Lahore incident please?”

SARFRAZ N: “It’s a conspiracy by Daud Ibrahim, Bukhatir and the Mumbai bookies.”

ME: “WHATTT!”

SF: “It should be obvious. As General G repeatedly points out, we must first ask who the beneficiaries can be. Here, the idea is to make sure cricket is switched from Pakistan to the Emirates so that match fixing can flourish again and kick start a sinking UAE economy.”

ME: “But...”

MULLAH F: “The men were not terrorists. They were holy instruments of God’s wrath against infidels.”

RANDOM CRICKET LOVER (interrupting): “I don’t agree. It is clear that India and the West are conspiring with the incompetent lot who head the PCB to ensure an Islamic cricket team does not win the next World Cup.

“Just think. First they conspire to ban our two world-beaters, Shoaib Akhtar and Mohammad Asif, on trumped up drug and fitness charges. Next they mislead and trap our best batsman, the innocent Mohammed Yousaf, into legal disqualification. The coup de grace was to be delivered at Liberty Market by wiping out the rest of the talented current Pakistan team.

“Is it not sinister and incriminating that all the PCB top brass (including the patron who, instead of performing his real duty — concentrating on cricket — was busy with state affairs) did not travel with the team on the bus? Why do you think the teams had been promised residential level security?

“But these RAW Hindus are so incompetent they mistakenly targeted the Sri Lankans. If this is not a conspiracy, call me a moron.”

CHORUS: “Conspiracy! Conspiracy! Conspiracy!”

ME: “But...”

PUNJAB LAW MIN: “No ‘buts’. This incident is the direct outcome of Governor’s Rule.”

I KHAN: “When a buzdil leadership embraces American slavery, and fights America’s war against its own people, it is only natural that the ghairatmand Taliban types...oops, I mean unknown terrorists will react. If you do not learn from the history of the Khulafa-e-Rashideen — or should that be Awadh? — then only I, er, I mean God, can help you!”

CH N: “Hum who nahin thay...”

CH S: “I am in mourning. We must wait before conspiring.”

NS: “Everyone knows 16 crore awaam is behind me. So why did I only get a few million votes? I must ask Ishaq Dar, who does all my counting, to resolve this puzzling conspiracy. Did the awaam really also vote for other parties?”

GUV P: “Even though I am a certified accountant, I have lost count of the warnings I issued to all terrorists to follow my example and operate constitutionally. I am a businessman. Now they will pay.”

CHORUS: “Conspiracy! Conspiracy! Conspiracy!”

ME: “But why does no one still tell who is behind the Liberty Market attacks?”

SS: “Did I hear someone say, ‘Liberty Market’? It is my duty to inform the public there is a tandoor there, under the sasti roti scheme introduced by yours truly, the humble Khadim-e-Punjab. Some say the terrorists had breakfast there. Alhamdulillah! Proves what a hit all my initiatives are with the ghareeb awam.”

AA: “Everyone should listen to me. Am I not one of the world’s declared top intellectuals? I say the terrorists should have carried out their attack peacefully through a long march. And, certainly, they should have given a dharna instead of running away.”

MUSH: “It is a conspiracy.”

CHORUS: “Conspiracy! Conspiracy! Conspiracy!”

ME (despairingly): “Will anyone tell me who these terrorists are?”

KK & AA: “We will. Are we not, respectively, a top anchor, and a senior investigative reporter? Have we ever given you a personal opinion dressed as fact? Did we not, within hours of the incident, categorically tell you there was not even a 1 percent doubt — yes, not even a 1 percent doubt — the attack was carried out by RAW?”

CHORUS: “Conspiracy! Conspiracy! Conspiracy!”

At this point I bring the thought experiment to an end. Yep. It has been a useful exercise. It is clear that everyone, inside and outside Pakistan, particularly RAW, is conspiring against us. But what is so disheartening is that, in spite of such certain knowledge, our destiny is to be victims.

What should I do? Is there a concept called ‘anti-conspiracy’? (Daily Times)

The writer is a businessman. A selection of his columns is now available in book form. Visit munirattaullah.com


Also read:

"RAW Totay": The conspiracy theory parrots. The supporters of Sipah-e-Sahaba and Taliban remember Lal Masjid and shed crocodile tears....

Asinine and anodyne in '09?: The industry of conspiracy theory in Pakistan

Everyone at fault, except us. Why is it that everything that goes against us becomes a conspiracy?

International conspiracies against Pakistan - an eye opener for conspiracy theorists


Read more...

Saturday, 7 March 2009

Lahore terror attack and our misguided patriotism


Pakistani militants seen most likely behind attack

Saturday, 07 Mar, 2009 (Dawn)

A government official said groups such as the LeJ were highest on the list of suspects.—AFP
A government official said groups such as the LeJ were highest on the list of suspects.—AFP

ISLAMABAD: An investigation into the attack on Sri Lanka’s cricket team in Lahore has found signs that Pakistani militants with possible ties to al Qaeda were responsible, a senior government official said on Saturday.

‘The indications are that it was one of our own homegrown groups, with possible linkages abroad,’ said the government official with knowledge of the investigation.

Police have rounded up scores of suspects but have yet to announce a breakthrough in their investigation of Tuesday’s attack.

‘It’s a tough job. We’re connecting the dots. We’re making every effort to get to the bottom and hopefully we’ll do it,’ said Salahuddin Niazi, the policeman heading the investigation.

‘Any word before finalising the investigation will benefit the criminals. Let’s finalise it, then we’ll be able to point the finger at someone or a group or groups,’ he said.

A local newspaper, citing a former high-ranking intelligence official in Punjab, said al Qaeda-linked Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ) militants were responsible for the attack.

Speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the subject, the government official said groups such as the LeJ were highest on the list of suspects.

Some of the explosives carried by the assailants were not available in Pakistan, he said.

The official was dismissive of media speculation that India may have been behind the attack as payback for the assault by militants on Mumbai in November.

......

Sri Lankan report links LTTE with LeT
By Frances Bulatsinghala
Saturday, 07 Mar, 2009 (Dawn)
COLOMBO, March 6: Military links between the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) and the militant Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) organisation went back to the early 1990s, the Sri Lankan Presidential Secretariat said on Friday.

As early as 1992, LTTE leader Sathasivam Krishnakumar alias Kittu had negotiated an arms deal with the militants based in Peshawar, the presidential research unit said in a report.

The links dated back to 1992, the report said, when Kittu, a prominent strategist of the LTTE at the time, negotiated arms purchases for the LTTE in Peshawar. This was uncovered by intelligence sources. In 1993, an Indian intelligence agency identified the vessel in which Kittu was transporting the weapons. The ship was destroyed and Kittu was killed.

There had also been speculations, the report said, that the LTTE might have had external help in firing missiles which brought down two Avro aircraft near Palali airbase in April 1995, killing a large number of civilians. “It was believed at the time that the LTTE may have used mercenaries with links to Peshawar or Afghanistan, to fire the missiles which hit the aircraft, links which have remained till today.”

Intelligence sources were aware that LTTE’s links with the LeT continued and there were ‘good and substantiated reports’ of the Sri Lankan terrorists group and LeT exchanging expertise, LeT supplying arms to the LTTE and both carrying out joint training.

Suspicions about LTTE’s hand in the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team emanated from the aspects of planning and the resources that were available to the attackers, the report said.

“The information that the attackers had planned to take the Sri Lankan players hostage is also being viewed by intelligence sources in South Asian capitals, in the context of LTTE’s current position of near defeat, and the search for a bargaining tool for its call for a ceasefire.”

The report said that some Indian analysts were of the view that had “the attackers been successful and taken all or any of the Sri Lankan players hostage, and used them for bargaining with Sri Lanka, or either with India or Pakistan or both, it would have led to a major diplomatic crisis in the region”.

The reports cite a statement by the US State Department which condemned the attack and said that it was not only an attack on innocent civilians but also on the positive relations between Pakistan and Sri Lanka. “This is not just an attack on individuals; this is an attack on peaceful, normal relations.”

The presidential statement said that the US viewpoint came very close to suspicions of well-informed intelligence sources that the LTTE might have been trying to seek revenge for the strong support that Pakistan had given to Sri Lanka in its fight against terror. “This high-level support has gone on from 1999, and has contributed much to the LTTE’s current position of being on the brink of defeat,” the report said.

.......

China sees risk of northwest attacks

BEIJING: China’s tense far, north-western region of Xinjiang faces threats from violence rippling across south and Central Asia and enforcing stability there will be tough this year, a senior official said on Friday. The regional governor, Nuer Baikeli, told reporters that violence in Afghanistan and recent attacks in India and Pakistan showed Xinjiang had reason to fear what China calls the “three forces” — terrorism, separatism and religious extremism. “We are very concerned about this problem,” he said. “With instability and uncertainty increasing in neighbouring areas, will it affect us? But we can prevent this and have confidence we can properly control the border and keep terrorist attacks beyond our borders.” Nuer Baikeli was speaking at a briefing on the sidelines of the annual meeting of China’s parliament. reuters (Daily Times, 7 March 2009)

......


Misguided patriotism
Saturday, March 07, 2009
Since the terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan team early this week, we have been hit by what our media evidently sees as some kind of attempt at patriotism. Within hours of the incident, anchors hosting news shows and many analysts they called in to comment on what had happened began insisting that India was responsible for the attack. There is no way of knowing how or why they reached this instant conclusion. Certainly, given that none of the gunmen were apprehended, there was little in terms of solid evidence. The argument that the attackers looked like those who hit Mumbai does not mean anything at all. Should we then assume clairvoyance?

What these media pundits, caught up in their own misguided zeal, seem not to realize is that they are in fact hurting Pakistan's interests rather than serving them. While there may have been an attempt to emulate the Indian media in the aftermath of the Mumbai attacks, the fact is that resorting to the level of immaturity and bigotry displayed by their Indian counterparts does no good at all. Pakistan would have created a far better impression of itself had it shown the capacity to rise above the level of the Indians and demonstrate a true desire to discover who was behind the attacks, rather than merely pointing in a particular direction.

There is still time to make such amends. We seem to have become caught up in a general effort to lay responsibility somewhere or the other; some blame Salmaan Taseer, others Shahbaz Sharif; still others the agencies. The fact is that any kind of truth will emerge only if we can carry out a proper, impartial investigation. This is possible only if pre-conceptions are put aside and an all-out effort made to arrive at the truth. This is what the media should be focusing on. Rather than itself reaching conclusions as to who is responsible, the role of journalists should be to demand a full inquiry and to press for this. The interests of Pakistan would be far better served by such a policy. If Indian involvement was discovered at some level, such findings would have far greater credibility if they came in an environment that was not marred by prejudice and the hurling of wild accusations. The tone adopted by our media has simply shown we are no better than the Indians. This evidence of blind bias will take us nowhere, and in the longer run may complicate the task of getting to the truth. (The News, Editorial, 7 March 2009)

.....

Lahore: the final wake-up call
Saturday, March 07, 2009
Praful Bidwai

By targeting Sri Lankan cricketers in the heart of Lahore, Pakistani militants have crossed yet another red line. The attackers were well-trained terrorists armed with rocket launchers, grenades and automatic guns. That they engaged the police in a 25-minute gun battle and escaped only proves their professional prowess.

They didn't target the cricket team because they have anything in particular against Sri Lanka. We still don't know their identity, but they could be any one or a combination of jihadi groups, from Al-Qaeda offshoots, to Baitullah Mehsud's Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), to Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) or Jaish-e-Mohammed. These organisations form a continuum, with a lot of flux between them currently.

Their motive seems to have been threefold. First, to produce mayhem and insecurity, and show that neither the police, nor ordinary Pakistani citizens, nor apolitical foreigners, are immune from their depredations, and the government is powerless. Secondly, they wanted to show they aren't cowed down by the recent arrests for the Mumbai attacks and can repeat a mini-Mumbai in Pakistan. They may also have been trying hostage-taking to free detained jihadi militants. Last but not least, they wanted to signal their bellicose defiance to coincide with the India-Pakistan visit of the US Federal Bureau of Investigation chief Robert Mueller. The FBI is collaborating with Indian agencies in investigating Mumbai, and reportedly has strong evidence against LeT. Its personnel might stand witness in the Mumbai case.

An FBI team was camping in Pakistan to interrogate Zarar Shah and Zaki-ur Rehman Lakhvi, the Mumbai attacks' handlers. The jihadis' message to it was to lay off and recognise that Taliban-style militancy has come to stay in Pakistan and Afghanistan. Under its sway, the disgraceful Swat deal to impose the Sharia can be repeated in the heart of Punjab. The message? The more you yield to the jihadis, the more emboldened they become to come back for more.

The Swat deal was signed by the NWFP government led by the secular Awami National Party. It was the result of utter desperation and insecurity, which is so extreme that ANP leaders no longer dare step out of their homes. The truth is the army's 20,000 troops in Malakand division could not defeat the TTP's 3,000 militants. Meanwhile, the ANP's strategy of countering the fundamentalism of the mullahs of the Tehreek Nifaz-e-Sharia Mohammedi (TNSM) with Pushtun nationalism failed.

The writ of the state no longer runs in Malakand. The TTP and the TNSM under Maulana Fazlullah have overrun Swat, closing down girls' schools, turning women into prisoners in their homes, preventing men from shaving beards, and generally terrorising a 1.5 million-strong population, causing 350,000 people to flee. Yet, the government dishonestly rationalises the Swat deal as the sole means to restore peace in keeping with "the people's will". Foreign Minister Shah Mehmood Qureishi has termed it "a local remedy for a local problem." Even information minister Sherry Rehman has rationalised its extension beyond Swat to the other five districts of Malakand.

The Lahore attack coincides with the aggravation of multiple other crises in Pakistan. These include a severe economic recession, inflation at 25%, and plummeting foreign reserves; a crisis of governance, with insurgencies raging in volatile provinces and; growing disintegration of state institutions.

The latest is the political crisis precipitated by the Supreme Court's judgment to disqualify former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif and Punjab Chief Minister Shahbaz Sharif, from holding public office or contesting elections. This has put Pakistan's two largest parties on a collision course.

The judgment is widely seen as a rigged verdict delivered by hand-picked judges appointed by President Asif Ali Zardari, who had been sworn in under former President Musharraf's Provisional Constitutional Order. Even Prime Minister Gilani regrets the verdict as unfortunate.

Zardari wants to control the Punjab and is loath to thwart any challenge to the collusive National Reconciliation Ordinance. He has betrayed his promise to restore Chief Justice Iftikhar Chaudhry, for whose reinstatement lawyers are launching a mass agitation. This is likely to lead to a huge confrontation, with grave consequences for Pakistan's stability, and for the always-precarious balance between military and civilian power.

However, the army has no coherent strategy to deal with the rising tide of terrorism and religious extremism. It has allowed the Afghan Taliban's Quetta Shura to flourish and provided sanctuary to its militants in the border areas. But its calculation that it would achieve its objective of creating "strategic depth" in Afghanistan and yet control the Pakistan jihadi militancy has gone awry. Benazir Bhutto's assassination, the Marriott Hotel attack, and the Lahore episode bear testimony to this.

The army is either unwilling or worse, unable to fully join the fight against the jihadi militancy in Pakistan. Nor is it really cooperating with the US-led forces in Afghanistan and hasn't broken the nexus between Afghanistan's Al-Qaeda-Taliban and Pakistan's TTP-TNSM, as the latter escalate their deadly threat to its state. This has aggravated the state's legitimacy crisis.

With all its institutions in disarray, the Pakistani state is beginning to unravel. It may be too early to talk of Pakistan imploding, but power in Pakistan is increasingly fragmented and the state no longer controls large swathes of territory. The commonest image of this is the failed or failing state. Pakistan figures at Rank Nine in the Failed States Index compiled for 2008 by Foreign Policy magazine of the Fund for Peace (US).

Somalia holds the first rank, Sudan the second, and Zimbabwe the third. Pakistan is just two ranks below Afghanistan, and marginally higher than war-ravaged Central African Republic and Guinea.

The index may not be perfect, but it's a good pointer. Twelve criteria are used to compile it, including the state's criminalisation and delegitimisation, progressive deterioration of public services, widespread human rights violations, security apparatus as "a state within a state", legacy of vengeance-seeking groups, the rise of factionalised elites, uneven economic development along group lines, sharp and/or severe economic decline, and movement of refugees and internally displaced, etc. Pakistan scores badly (8 or higher on a deteriorating scale of 10) on 10 of the 12--a sign of its slow unravelling.

This will have dreadful consequences for South Asia, including Afghanistan. It's ludicrous to react to Lahore by pointing fingers at India, as some Pakistani leaders did, or adopting smug "we-told-you-so" postures, as India's Home Minister P Chidambaram did.

The US cannot sort out Pakistan. It has a myopic and parochial agenda -- witness its withdrawal from Afghanistan in 1989 after creating the deadly mujahidin network there. Defence Secretary Robert Gates now says Washington "would be very open" to a Swat-style agreement in Afghanistan. The emerging strategy of a "troops surge", which President Obama is keen on, coupled with appeasement and bribery of the jihadis, is bad news.

The only sensible alternative is a regional approach to isolate the jihadis who are a menace for all of South Asia. But for this to materialise, the Pakistani state must summon up the will to crack down on groups like LeT and LeJ and their domestic and Afghan collaborators. Lahore is the final wake-up call. We must all answer it before it's too late. (The News, 7 March 2009)



The writer, a former newspaper editor, is a researcher and peace and human-rights activist based in Delhi. Email: prafulbidwai1@yahoo.co.in

....

Monsters & delusions
Out of my head

Monday, March 09, 2009
Khusro Mumtaz

Apart from the expected horror and dismay at the attacks on the Sri Lankan cricketers, there was another reaction from a number of people that I talked to that added to my depression. They couldn’t believe that the attackers were Pakistanis. “No Pakistani could do this”, “Why would they do this?”, “What is to be gained?” they said, either implying Indian involvement or laying the blame on our neighbours outright.

While nothing can be discounted outright in this murky world that we currently inhabit the refusal to acknowledge the monsters in our midst is perplexing and dismaying. Why can’t Pakistanis be behind this atrocity? After all, Pakistanis enter mosques and mow down other Pakistanis. Shias kill Sunnis and Sunnis kill Shias. Minorities are threatened and their places of worship are damaged, destroyed and blown up. Schools are razed. Women buried alive. Foreigners kidnapped and beheaded. The list goes on. There is much that is wrong within us (and much of the horror inflicted in the name of religion) and even if the majority of Pakistanis are peaceful and peace-loving, there is definitely a minority out there which aims to impose its obscurantist views on the rest of us and will go to any lengths to achieve its objectives. Murdering a visiting cricket team is not beyond the realm of possibility.

The genie — manufactured and nurtured by men in khaki, originally encouraged by players in the great game, used as a bargaining chip by would-be tyrants, financed by petro-dollars — is out of the bottle and has been for a long time, and it is going to take all of our combined wills to contain it. But we first have to acknowledge the problem. Without accepting the problem we can’t fix it, yet many of us continue to delude ourselves that the genie doesn’t exist.

These delusions are encouraged by right-wing, fascist nut-jobs (sometimes disguised as “enlightened moderates” and not to be confused with religious fundamentalists) who get on their soap-boxes (conveniently provided to them by media conglomerates that worship only at the altar of perhaps the most powerful god of all, profit) and on television talk shows and op-ed columns advocate retaliatory strikes and Mossad-style targeted killings, a la “Operation Wrath of God”, the Israeli covert plan to assassinate the killers of eleven Israeli athletes at the 1972 Munich Olympics.

I wish I was making this up but I am not. Worse, this lunacy is propounded when we haven’t even been able to identify who was behind the attack on the Sri Lankan team and — many chest-thumping pronouncements (from the president on downwards) of leaving no stone unturned to capture the killers or the formation of the highest level inquiry committees notwithstanding — I am not holding my breath either that we ever will, given our past track record and considering the ease with which the terrorists were able to carry out their attacks and the even greater ease with which they managed to disappear from the scene. The lapses and the screw-ups by our intelligence agencies and security apparatus were shocking yet instead of highlighting these appalling failures or talking about the beasts in our midst and who is responsible for setting them loose, these delusional lunatics are talking about targeted killings and what-not. They must have seen too many Steven Spielberg Hollywood blockbusters for their own good or the good of their compatriots. “Operation Wrath of God” indeed!

Post-script: I don’t have enough words of praise for the decency, dignity and grace exhibited by the courageous Sri Lankan players despite having every legitimate cause for complaint and anger after their terrible ordeal. Not one of them has yet expressed a bitter or acrimonious sentiment. If more of us exhibited this generosity of spirit the world would be experiencing much less strife than it is. I also salute their brave bus driver, Mehar Mohammad Khalil whose quick-thinking and courage prevented an even bigger tragedy. He is a real Pakistani hero as are the policemen who gave their lives in the line of duty. (The News, 9 March 2009)

The writer is a banker and freelance writer. Email: khusro_m@ yahoo.co.uk

....

Reviving the peace process
Monday, March 09, 2009
Talat Masood

Every major terrorist attack whether it was 9/11 or those that occurred subsequently in South Asia have triggered a chain of events that have resulted in putting Pakistan under great pressure. The Mumbai terrorist attack in November 2008 resulted in freezing the Indo- Pakistan peace process and revived the Cold War mentality and jargon between the two countries. India since then has been saying that it will keep all options open implying even a limited military action against Pakistan. It, however, eventually opted for a full blown diplomatic and media offensive. Fortunately, tensions have since come down and rhetoric from New Delhi is more tempered after Pakistan took certain specific actions against the alleged perpetrators of the crime but relations remain fragile.

India’s initial anguish and outrage was understandable but, as experience of US has shown, military action and aggressive policies are highly counterproductive and in fact lead to a situation that favours the militants. The events of 9/11 trigged the invasion of Afghanistan and Iraq and destabilized Pakistan. The Indian government’s restraint therefore has been as much in its own interest as for the region.

Meanwhile, the terrorist attack in Lahore on the Sri Lankan team once again exposed the weakness of the Pakistani state. The ease with which the terrorists committed the crime and melted away in the population reaffirms the international concern that Pakistan is a safe haven and a victim of terrorism. It is apparent that terrorist network and infrastructure has expanded in every province and that these elements have evolved over time in shifting political environments. It is not only confined to FATA, NWFP and Baluchistan but has crept into Punjab and other parts of the country.

The Lahore incident also demonstrates that radicalism is moving eastward at a fast space. There was a wide spread belief that the Taliban movement or militancy will not be able to cross the Indus due to Punjab being relatively more progressive and developed and its higher representation in the military.

The premise has proven to be wrong. All this further justifies the need for improved relations between India and Pakistan.

What exactly were the motives or strategic objectives of the Mumbai and Lahore terrorist attacks may be difficult to asses at this stage. And were these independent of each other or is there a common thread that runs through both these events? Nonetheless, it is clear that both have contributed to destabilizing our government and deflecting attention from the western border and addressing the real problems facing the country.

Understandably there was considerable anguish and frustration in India when the Mumbai incident occurred. Pakistan’s initial response of failing to acknowledge Kasab as its citizen soured relations with India. New Delhi viewed the denial as a course that Pakistan was adopting, which was unacceptable. Islamabad wisely took a U- turn and shifted from its position of total denial to full acknowledgement that was made at the highest level by the adviser to the prime minister Mr Rehman Malik, and went further by registering FIR against specific individuals and arrested several militant leaders. In addition, Pakistan went out of its way to over comply with UNSC resolution 1267, while imposing sanctions against Jamaat-ud Daawa.

This point should not be lost in India and it should reciprocate and extend maximum cooperation in the investigation. Moreover, due to lack of trust it is being overlooked by New Delhi that there are genuine legal issues that need to be sorted out with prosecutors and lawyers of both sides. Cooperation and greater level of trust is therefore crucial at this juncture. For fighting terrorism Pakistan, too, has to introduce additional legislation for prosecuting terrorists. And more importantly, there has to be change of mindset. Our leaders have failed to impress upon the people that on issues of terrorism there is a larger challenge of meeting international obligations.

Prior to the Mumbai incident the composite dialogue was moving forward, albeit slowly, toward normalizing relations. Many useful civil and military CBMs had opened avenues for trade, commerce and travel. The cease fire on the line of control was holding; missile notification and nuclear risk reduction measures were adopted. Back channel was in progress. India had refrained from passing any adverse remarks on Pakistan’s internal situation which was passing through a very difficult period from the middle of 2006 onwards. Islamabad too stayed away from any interference during elections in J&K and took deliberate measures to prevent cross border infiltration. All that was shattered by the Mumbai terrorist act!

It is time the leaders of the two countries review their policy toward each other. The composite dialogue has to commence at the earliest. A realistic assessment however, is to expect that India would resume the process only after the national elections in mid 2009. Pakistan is currently burdened with serious internal dissensions. Until the PPP and PML-N do not resolve their differences on major domestic issues relations with India will remain on the back burner and preclude any serious efforts at resumption. Regrettably, the terrorists are going to take full advantage of this hiatus.

Meanwhile, it is important that both countries continue to faithfully implement the agreed CBMs and keep expanding their economic and cultural ties, where possible. In the absence of formal government contacts the civil society link is vital. Track-2 should be revived and strengthened and its efforts could then be fed into Track-1 one at an opportune time.

The possibility of a more dramatic move after elections in form of a visit by the Pakistani prime minister to India or India’s prime minister to Pakistan could give a huge impetus to unfreezing the relationship.

War on terror climate has given terrorists an unwanted leverage. No time should be lost by the governments in taking the initiative back in their hands. (The News, 9 March 2009)

The writer is a retired lieutenant-general. Email: talat@comsats.net.pk

....

Also read:

Lahore terror attack: Lashkar-e-Jhangavi and allied sectarian/jihadi groups involved


Some relevant comments:


source: pk politics

fanaticmulla said:

everyone is speculating involvement of different groups or agencies..but noone has discussed the possibility of involvement of JI or jamiat in these attacks..they are also very dangerous and want to destabilize Pakistan for their own reasons . They have got also trained terrorists who can carry out such operation with ease…

Police should investigate this matter from every aspect and should include all ethnic/religious organizations which can become a tool of foriegners to destabilize Pakistan



fanaticmulla said:

bbc analysis about lahore attcks

http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/miscellaneous/story/2009/03/090306_liberty_analysis.shtml

very valid points, what hamid gul, zaid hamid and hamid mir will do if Al.qaida, taliban or other extremists claim the resonsibilty ..in the past after POF wah attack and marriott attack same Jihadi group started “international powers are involved ” and in one week Al qaida /taliban said that we have done that

there is only one sentecne about these so called Jihadi media mafia

Thook Kay Chatna

irshad khan said:

I believe Imran Khan and Rtd Gen Hamid Gul do not like speaking the truth, they are again protecting Taliban and extremist parties and blame every one else in the world.
Recently Imran Khan claimed that foreign cricket players will not be harmed and his friends proved him wrong. I really wonder what their goals are.
People in Pakistan must form their own opinions based on their own experience and knowledge. These hypocrites are misleading people in Pakistan;
Broad day light attack in Lahore was shocking and worrisome, entire group escaped safely, this was only possible with the help of local people and this should be a serious concern. Police failed to handle the situation and now facing harsh criticism.

My comments about Imran Khan and Hamid gul are based on facts, Hamid Gul is responsible for killing thousands in frontier area when he was with ISI, now he is trying to please them as he know they want hin killed. Imran Khan and Hamid Gul must be blind when they are always praising and defending Taliban and religious extremists and not holding them responsible for any wrong doings, they never see when acid was thrown on school girls faces in Swat, they never heard about the bomb being exploded all over Pakistan killing thousand of people, all they know is to blame US, UK, Army, present Government and Musharaf. You can never correct yourself if you have your head buried in the sand and refuse to admit to your faults.

AClarionCall said:

People like Hameed Gul know one thing best and that is to hate and spread hate. You have correctly compared him with Rush Limbaugh who does the same thing on his Radio. Why people like him and Qazi, Imran Khan and Taliban’s mouthpiece Hamid Mir do not understand that talibanisation of this country is highly dangerous for the entire Paksitani society. We must not give in to terrorists. Lahore attack has given terrorists another victory and we are fighting with each other blaming Govt for this attack. Only our national unity can enable us win war against terrorists.

Fikarmand said:

How many innocent poeple are killed everyday in FATA and Swat by Talibans, whom the Military establishment call Mujahideen. Gen Hameed Gul repeatedly says there is a little misunderstanding between Pakistan Military and Taliban, ohterwise they are our front line force to save Pakistan…
The policy of Pakistani Establishment and Military has miserably failed times and again. “AS YOU SOW, SO SHALL YOU REAP”.
I think its yet not too late to mend and make Paki Army Genarals and ISI work for the people of Pakistan and do not pursue their own stupid agenda of strategic interst.
Down with Talibans and these terrorrists and they need to be wiped out through a comprehensive strategy…..

Kashif said:

Taliban have the right to live but they don’t have right to kill others brutally. Disagreements, dialouges are you out of your mind? They don’t want girls to be taught beyond 4th grade, they don’t want physics, chemistry, bio anything taught in schools, just religion. Please be their mouth piece if you are willing to live in their life style. Your leader IK’s kids are raised in England by jewish mom and for the poor innocents in tribal area and sawat he says Taliban brings the best justice system. Instead of getting talking points from Hamid Gul and Jammat Islami and piosioning thousands of innocents minds like your he and people like you should put your money where your mouth is…go and live in Taliban country and then preach the junk you are preaching. Which religion allows these brutal killings in the name of spreading God’s word?

Fikarmand said:

Zaid Hamid is a poisionous spokesperson of ISI and corrupt Generals. The stupid is a criminal and liar. He is the shoe polisher of corrupt elites and ISI. He is also call Talibans as Pakistni assett.
To all those who have sympathy for Talibans, wait when the conqueror Lahore and Sialkot and then I will agree with you and Zahid Hameed.
Zahid Hameed is a stupid CROOK like QAZI AND FAZLOO and IMRAN KHAN


Read more...

Friday, 6 March 2009

Lahore terror attack: Lashkar-e-Jhangavi and allied sectarian/jihadi groups involved


From a state of denial to accepting ownership?

Ayesha Ijaz Khan writes in The News (6 March 2009):

While Pakistanis are not completely out of line if they have concerns about India's hegemonic designs and regional threats to their existence (in recent months, these threats have amplified. Yet, equally dangerous, if not more so, is the enemy within); regrettable as it is, it would not be unfair to say that extremism has permeated our society and over the past many decades there has been a systematic transfer of power from the secular segments of society to those claiming to pose as Islamists.

There is too much tolerance for religious posers, and precious little for dissent in secular terms. This is exhibited across the board. The biggest culprits of course have been successive governments, willing to make peace deals with those who threaten the very fabric of our legal and value structure, yet unwilling to accommodate political dissent or civil society activism based on globally-accepted human values.

But the trouble is also evident among large segments of our society at large. Those who hide behind the cloak of religiosity are rarely questioned about their motives or their actions. Even ten years ago, before the menace of Talibanization crept upon us so forcefully, a policeman, for instance, was far more likely to fine a clean-shaven driver as opposed to a bearded one.

I find it ridiculous, for example, when some analysts ask what the extremists would gain by targeting the Sri Lankans and thus further isolating Pakistan. What do they gain by burning girls' schools? What do they gain by mutilating dead bodies? What do they gain by attacking concerts? Isn't it just the spread of panic and fear that they are after? Have they been emboldened further by the deal in Swat?

Najmuddin Shaikh writes in Daily Times:

But if we want to face reality, we must accept that this was a homegrown attack. If it had foreign financing and perhaps some foreign planning, the finger should point not only towards our eastern border but also to the north of our own country. It is there that those who found shelter now find themselves under pressure, which can best be relieved if their sympathisers in Punjab — and there are plenty of those — can be motivated to create chaos and anarchy in the capital of the country’s largest province.

Najam Sethi writes in Daily Times:

No one will disagree that it was premature on the part of the media to start discussing an “Indian hand” in the terrorist attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team on March 3. Relying on a CID letter warning the government weeks in advance that the attack would be launched by India’s secret agency RAW, the media took off, bringing in commentators and analysts who were already wedded to the idea from their ideological convictions. But the campaign is coming unstuck even as it unfolds.....

The agencies have been finally forced to look for “local groups”, and that means the vast jihadi network now working for Al Qaeda and the Taliban. Because of their old linkages within the state institutions, these groups are able to plant “information” on our security personnel to confuse them and get them to ignore the real culprits. There is an unending stream of reported evidence that the jihadi organisations of Punjab are all aligned with Al Qaeda and have been involved in acts of terrorism planned by it. Yet, all TV discussions avoid naming them, preferring to focus on “foreign hands” that are never finally revealed.

...

Lahore Liberty ambush: Defunct outfit involvement revealed

Updated at: 0915 PST, Friday, March 06, 2009

Gunmen carrying their weapons

Gunmen carrying their weapons as they leave on foot after the ambush on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore


ISLAMABAD: A defunct religious outfit ambushed the Sri Lankan cricket team and the assailants had come from the tribal areas.

Sources said that the law enforcing agencies have dug out evidences against the attackers, which revealed that the terrorists having links with Afghanistan give rise to this conclusion that Al Qaeda was also indirectly involved in the Libery tragedy.

Sources said that the two vehicles near the Big City Plaza, which were used for Sri lankan team’s ambush had come there early in the morning and no one checked them. Sources said that the terrorists, who has stayed in the Youth Hostel, took part in the action, while the other accomplices had stayed at Kot Lakhpat and Township Area. Secret agencies have found out from the record obtained from cellular phone that the terrorist’ four associates were present around Qaddafi Stadium, who in touch among themselves through mobile phones---one of them stationed near Punjab University new campus, other at Lahore Canal near Qaddafi Stadium, the third one at nearby Boulevard, while the fourth in the Firdaus market area.

Sources claimed that the terrorists kept using the station code for Sri Lankan team van and as soon as the van reached Liberty Chowk, the terrorists told each other that the ‘station’ was about to arrive. According to information, among the 14 terrorists a few belonged to Lahore, while others came from the tribal areas armed with explosives RDX highly inflammable.

Sources said that a breakthrough has been achieved as plausible evidences have been obtained and some crucial arrests could be made in the next one/two days.

http://www.thenews.com.pk/updates.asp?id=70601

.....



....

Investigators see LeT footprints in Lahore attack
By Mubashir Zaidi and Irfan Raza
Friday, 06 Mar, 2009 (Dawn)

ISLAMABAD: Investigators are zeroing in on the footprints of the banned Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT), according to preliminary investigations by the Joint Investigation Team probing Tuesday’s attack on Sri Lankan cricketers at Lahore’s Liberty Chowk.

Sketchy details of the initial probe suggest that a group of headstrong Lashkar activists, who went underground and remained in hiding in Rawalpindi after the crackdown on Lashkar and Jamaatud Dawa in December, had acted on their own and carried out the attack.

Although officials would not confirm the involvement of Lashkar, they categorically ruled out the possibility of involvement of the Indian spy agency RAW (Research and Analysis Wing) or the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) as no evidence has been found so far pointing in their direction.

At least eight people, six policemen among them, were killed after 12 gunmen attacked the bus carrying Sri Lankan cricketers to Qadhafi Stadium.

The attack has killed hopes of any international sports events in Pakistan for months, if not years, and seriously damaged Pakistan’s reputation to host any international sporting event, including the 2011 Cricket World Cup.

The prime minister’s adviser on interior, Rehman Malik, refused to comment on the investigations when asked.

‘At this moment I can only say that investigations into the Lahore attack are going in the right direction. We have also involved the National Database Registration Authority (Nadra) to determine the identity of the attackers,’ he told Dawn.

Interestingly, officials working at Nadra told Dawn that they had no facility to match the sketches with the database. ‘It is a very expensive technology and we do not have it here. So Nadra cannot do anything in this regard,’ a top official of Nadra said.

But asked specifically about the involvement of Lashkar in the Lahore attack, Mr Malik said he could not reveal anything at the moment. ‘The preliminary report will be finalised by Friday. At this moment I can only say that reports regarding the involvement of LeT are speculation,’ he added.

Later he told reporters in Parliament that al Qaeda could be involved in the attack. He also said so far investigations had not yet found any Indian connection.

He told journalists that the involvement of India’s Raw had not been proved so far. But, he added, the final answer could only be given once the investigations were completed.

Mr Malik claimed that investigators had not found any link between the attackers and Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi, a key Pakistani suspect in the Mumbai attacks and the alleged trainer/handler of the suicide squad that wreaked havoc in India’s commercial hub in November last year.

But he refused to share details with media of the arrests made by the law enforcement agencies so far.

The investigators involved in the probe believe that the attackers got their commando training in the camp of Lashkar’s operational commander Zakiur Rehman Lakhvi as their modus operandi had similarities with the Mumbai attackers.

Lakhvi was detained by authorities on suspicion of involvement in the Mumbai terror attacks. He was picked up from his camp in Muzaffarabad on Dec 10 last year.

Investigators believed that one of the attackers had assured the chief suspect in Mumbai terror attacks that his followers would take revenge against Pakistani authorities for his arrest and subsequent trial.

The authorities have also approached Jamaatud Dawa chief Hafiz Saeed, who is currently under detention at his Johar Town residence in Lahore, to help authorities in tracking down the attackers.

http://www.dawn.net/wps/wcm/connect/Dawn%20Content%20Library/dawn/news/pakistan/investigators+see+let+footprints+in+lahore+attack--sal-up

.....

Pakistan IDs cricket attackers, security concerns mount

Sketch of four of the terrorists wanted in the attack on the Sri Lankan cricket team in Lahore on March 4.


LAHORE, Pakistan (AFP) — Authorities in Pakistan said they had identified the gunmen who attacked the Sri Lankan cricket team, as international concern mounted Friday over how the security plans failed.

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd of Australia, home to two officials caught up in Tuesday's deadly attack in the city of Lahore, demanded to know how up to 12 men were able to stage the assault, killing eight and wounding seven players.

Footage of the gunmen's getaway has raised questions about Pakistan's ability to combat Taliban and Al-Qaeda linked militants, who have carried out scores of attacks here over the last two years and are the main suspects.

"We have identified the people who did the operation," provincial governor Salman Taseer told reporters in Lahore late Thursday.

Police released sketches of four suspects and have brought in around two dozen people for questioning but no leads have been announced.

Taseer said he would comment further after reviewing an interim investigation report due Friday.

The gunmen fired on the Sri Lankan team convoy with automatic weapons, grenades and a rocket launcher as the vehicles travelled to Lahore's Gaddafi Stadium but all the attackers fled without a trace.

No one has yet claimed responsibility for the attack, which left a total of 19 people injured.

In Australia, Rudd said he was unhappy about the security concerns expressed by Australian cricket officials travelling with the team.

"I am sufficiently concerned about what has been said by the Australians that we need an explanation, and we intend to get one," he told a radio interviewer on Friday.

Simon Taufel, one of the umpires travelling in the convoy with the Sri Lankan team, said his bus had been left unprotected once the assault began.

"You tell me why supposedly 20 armed commandos were in our convoy and when the team bus got going again, we were left on our own? I don't have any answers to these questions," he said.

Pakistan lawmakers have accused the government of a "serious security lapse", highlighting reports that authorities were warned of a possible attack.

The top government official for Lahore conceded Thursday there were gaps in the security provisions made for the Sri Lankan team.

"A terrorist has to succeed only once, whereas security has to be successful all the time. After every incident one gets wiser. You get to know all the gaps and how you should not repeat those gaps," Khusro Pervaiz told AFP.

More than 1,600 people have been killed in attacks over the past 22 months in Pakistan, where Al-Qaeda and Taliban militants have forged a base in the rugged, lawless northwest along the border with Afghanistan.

For decades, Pakistan's ISI military intelligence agency has fostered Islamist militant groups in Kashmir and Afghanistan, and there are suspicions that some ISI elements have links to militants inside the country.

The South Asian country's long history of unsolved political attacks includes the assassination in December 2007 of former premier Benazir Bhutto.

Tuesday's attack was also a serious blow for cricket in Pakistan, as the International Cricket Council raised doubts about whether it could still co-host the sport's 2011 World Cup.

New Zealand has indicated a tour of Pakistan set for November will likely be called off.

http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5ik5u048DEW6VCSx2NYIvmnr6TxZQ

....

March 6, 2009

Gunmen who attacked cricketers in Lahore 'had links to al-Qaeda'

Pakistan has identified the gunmen who attacked Sri Lanka's cricket team in Lahore and arrested some key suspects, including the brother of the suspected mastermind, according to several officials.

Most of the two dozen detainees belonged to Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) and Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ), the outlawed militant groups with close links to al-Qaeda, security officials have told The Times.

Senior police officials said that the men behind Tuesday morning's attack might also have links to other militants fighting in Pakistan's lawless tribal region bordering Afghanistan.

However, it remained unclear last night whether those arrested included the gunmen who killed eight Pakistanis and injured six Sri Lankan players and one British assistant coach in Lahore. Salman Taseer, the Governor of the eastern province of Punjab, said only that the Government had identified the attackers but refused to give details until the investigation was completed.

“We have found a lot of evidence. We have recovered the weapons. We have identified the people who did the operation,” he told a news conference in Lahore.

Police also released sketches of four of the 12 gunmen, and Rehman Malik, the Interior Minister, said that a preliminary investigation report would be released today.

Some Pakistani officials have said that the attack bore the hallmarks of Lashkar-e-Taiba, the Pakistani militant group blamed for the attack on Mumbai in November.

But a senior Home Ministry official said that it appeared to be the work of al-Qaeda, which has masterminded previous attacks in Pakistan, including last year's suicide bombing on the Marriott hotel in Islamabad.

He said the investigation showed that Tuesday's attackers were from Punjab and North West Frontier Province, which has become the main battleground between militants and Pakistan's armed forces.

Intelligence sources said that southern Punjab had become the main centre of radical Islamic activities in the country. Despite a ban, groups such as JeM and LeJ had expanded their influence in the area, drawing recruits from among rural poor, they said.

Most of the gunmen involved in the attack on Mumbai in November came from the same region.

JeM has become a virtual extension of al-Qaeda and was blamed for most of the terrorist attacks in Pakistan after the country become an ally in the US-led War on Terror in 2001.

LeJ is an extremist Sunni sectarian group whose members overlap with JeM. It has also been involved in al-Qaeda-led attacks in Pakistan.

Pervez Musharraf, the former Pakistan President, voiced criticism of the security arrangements yesterday, saying that the special police guarding the Sri Lankan team should have responded and killed the attackers in less than three seconds.

“That should be the level of training that I expect from an elite force ... we need to improve that standard,” he said.

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/asia/article5854505.ece

....

Terrorism in Pakistan

State of denial

Mar 5th 2009 | LAHORE
From The Economist

The culprits behind the latest outrage


AFP Not a cricket shot

FOR many foreigners, events in Lahore, the capital of Punjab province, on March 3rd confirmed their view of Pakistan as a hotbed of terrorism. A dozen masked gunmen ambushed a convoy carrying Sri Lanka’s national cricket team, killing six policemen and two others, and wounding seven cricketers and a British coach. But for many Pakistani pundits, quick to appear on television, events fitted another familiar pattern: Pakistan as victim of Indian conspiracy.

In January Punjab’s intelligence service had warned the police that India’s spies were planning to attack the Sri Lankan team. Now the pundits claimed the ambush was intended as retaliation for the attack on Mumbai in November in which more than 170 people were killed, to show that Pakistan was a security risk. As evidence, they pointed to the assailants’ escape: Pakistan’s Islamist terrorists, went the argument, make sure to kill themselves as well as their victims. To bolster their case, they cited India’s crowing over its decision not to send its own cricket team, for which Sri Lanka’s was standing in, and its leaders’ complaints, after the attack, about Pakistan’s intact terrorist “infrastructure”.

This far-fetched analysis, and the refusal to accept the reality of Pakistan’s terrorist problem, owes much to the religious-nationalist leanings of many young but influential television presenters. Their opinions were formed by the distorted education they received under General Zia ul-Haq, Pakistan’s dictator from 1977-88. So, despite many occasions when al-Qaeda has claimed attacks in Pakistan, many Pakistanis refuse to believe the group exists, let alone that it is dangerous for their country.

In fact, however, a former high-ranking Pakistani intelligence official has given The Economist a much more plausible explanation for the Lahore attack: that it was the handiwork of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi (LeJ). This sectarian group, which also put New Zealand’s national cricketers to flight in 2002 after it exploded a bomb outside their hotel in Karachi, now works closely with an al-Qaeda/Taliban network in Pakistan’s tribal areas.

It has been blamed for several atrocities, including the bombing last September of the Marriott hotel in Islamabad, for which al-Qaeda this week also claimed responsibility, in a message to the Saudi embassy in the capital. According to the intelligence source, the security forces last year caught an LeJ terrorist, who is still in custody. He has confessed to being trained to carry out a suicide mission during a proposed international cricket tournament last year that in fact was shifted elsewhere.

In a society beset by Islamist violence, including some 60 suicide-bomb blasts in each of the past two years, this latest attack was less bloody than many, but nonetheless remarkable. Sri Lanka’s decision to send its revered cricketers to Pakistan, despite fears for their safety, was a brave act of South Asian solidarity from a country with terrorism troubles of its own. Its foreign minister this week visited Pakistan and offered condolences for the deaths of those killed protecting his compatriots.

That Pakistan has proved unable to provide effective security for the Sri Lankans, despite extraordinary efforts by Lahore’s police in the face of a manifest threat to their lives, is dispiriting. It seems reasonable to suppose that many of Pakistan’s dwindling foreign visitors, of all stripes, will now stay away from the country. At a time of economic duress, partly related to the country’s deepening insecurity, this will have repercussions far beyond cricket.

For many Pakistanis, however, the outcome for the country’s favourite game will be bad enough. It is almost unimaginable that other national sides will want to tour Pakistan in the near future. Pakistan’s ambition to be one of the hosts of the 2011 World Cup is surely in tatters. Though not quite the source of public hysteria that it is in India, cricket is one of Pakistan’s few unifying forces. Moreover, at a time of national shame over the many atrocities committed by Pakistan-reared militants at home and abroad, their cricketers’ performances were an export of which Pakistanis could be genuinely proud.

http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13240421

.....

Terror war comes to Lahore
Reality check

Friday, March 06, 2009
Shafqat Mahmood

They are destroying everything that made life normal. A game of cricket with a visiting foreign team, gave a message of well being. This made cricket an enemy. The resolve of the Sri Lankans to help Pakistan project an image of peace was heroic. This made them a target.

It is about time we understood that the real enemy is within. It may be comforting to blame outsiders; and nothing can be ruled out in the murky world of spy wars. But, this cannot be an excuse to deny that we have a problem.

This is not of American origin or Indian design. America began the rot by bankrolling a surrogate army to fight the soviets in Afghanistan. India raised the temperature by letting lose a reign of terror in Kashmir. But, we nurtured and nourished these non state actors as an adjunct to our normal security apparatus.

What we did not consider was the cost to the country or the blow back that this will create. The power of the gun is a heady brew. Those using it become accustomed to attention and to intimidation to get their way. They were not going to melt away just because a certain politician or General said that time has come for them to go back to their shops or ploughshares. Even expecting anything like this was fool hardiness.

Myths were also created to place these organizations in the mainstream of our national narrative. These are good people who will never fight the Pakistani state, we were told. Their enemy is only India and their theatre of operation the Indian occupied state of Jammu and Kashmir. Also, that they are within our control and will do as they are told.

Time has shown these beliefs to be total fabrications. They have never shied from committing acts of terror within the country. From the bombing of French engineers in Karachi to sectarian wars in Punjab and now the attack on the Sri Lankan team, the footprints of these organizations are everywhere.

They have reached a level of strength where they have become completely autonomous. There has been serious speculation for some time that the attack on the Indian parliament was carried out by Jaish-e-Mohammad. Pakistani intelligence operatives had no clue about it.

The Mumbai attack is now recognised to be a Lashkar-e-Taiba event. The government has half accepted this and more is to come. Again, despite some reckless accusations by Indian politicians, Pakistan intelligence agencies had no advance information of it. Even later, it was only the investigation and reportedly confessional statements by some of the accused that lay bare the details of the plan. The legendary Pakistani agencies were clueless.

Not being aware of operations by organizations that traditionally worked closely with them is not good for the intelligence agencies. While it creates plausible deniability, it also shows how autonomous these jihadi outfits have become. Spy games are not about mounting operations. Those are rare.

Good intelligence is all about information. When available, it can help prevent the bad and encourage the good. No information means being completely out of the loop and having little ability to influence events. This is paralysis and a nightmare for the agency concerned. Ultimately, it reflects a weakness of the state. That seems to be happening in this case.

There are reports on Wednesday evening, as I write this, that about five of the accused involved in Sri Lankan firing have been arrested. If these are the real people, it is possible that we may find out their true motive. But, without knowing much, I can predict that these attacks on the bus of the Sri Lankan cricket team had a fair amount to do with the arrest of LeT members and their expected trial in the near future.

Horrendous as this tragic attack is in which so many policemen have lost their lives and some Sri Lankan players injured, this should be seen as test of our resolve. If we buckle under and start making appeasing noises, the terrorists would have succeeded. This is a time to keep the pressure on and show that acts of terror will not deter us from trying criminals who use our territory to wage war outside.

We should also stop legitimising them by placing their acts in a context of anti-Americanism. This is what some people are doing when analysing events in FATA and Swat. The assumption is that if somehow the Americans would disappear from Afghanistan, all would be well.

This is balderdash. American presence in Afghanistan has indeed created a sanctuary for some Afghan Taliban and Al Qaeda in the tribal areas but extremist elements in other parts of the country have an agenda of their own. Pamphlets have begun to appear in Lahore markets and other places essentially targeting women. They should be modestly dressed and not shop alone etc. More is likely to come.

The seeds of extremism have been sown in all parts of the country. It is now almost a cliché to blame the madressah system for the spread of extremism but like most clichés it has a great deal of truth in it. Particularly in southern Punjab, the impact of the madressahs largely funded by Saudi money is huge.

These alternatives of education and nourishment are sucking in thousands among the poor. They otherwise would have no option but to depend on the state school system, which is in an abysmal state. It also does not provide meals. Mundane as this may sound it is not something to be scoffed at. Unless the state is able to compete with these alternatives, the battle for the hearts and minds of the poor is lost.

To create the possibility of winning, the state will first have to acknowledge internal terrorism as a serious problem. Despite much mouthing of right words, there is no evidence that a comprehensive holistic plan has been made to fight extremism. This involves, besides better policing, a combination of better services and a much better access to health and education for the poor.

In other words, investing serious money into the fight against extremism is essential. It would involve modernising the police force, creating greater capacity among prosecutors and court systems, and, investing in services for the poor. It is this three-pronged strategy that will possibly turn the situation around. This hand wringing and mouthing of pious slogans by the leadership would not get us anywhere.

While hopefully someone will pay attention to this, let us pause and say a silent prayer for Pakistani cricket. For many of us, it was not a sport but a passion. A cricket match would be more than a sporting contest. It was a gladiatorial fight and a social event rolled into one. Now for years to come, no one will come here. Another element of our way of life has come to an end.

This is not the passing of a torch from one generation to the other. This is a paradigm shift. We are not leaving a better world behind.


Email: shafqatmd@gmail.com

http://thenews.jang.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=165959

....

For further information about Lashkar-e-Jhangavi, read:

Book Review: The True Face of Jehadis - By Amir Mir

ISI supported Lashkar-i-Jhangavi and Sipah Sahaba in killing Shias in Pakistan

For a detailed account of Lashkar-e-Jhangvi reign of terror in Pakistan, read:

http://letusbuildpakistan.blogspot.com/search/label/Lashkar-e-Jhangavi


Read more...

Thursday, 5 March 2009

ICC Match Referee Chris Broad 'angry' over lack of security in Pakistan


http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/41664000/jpg/_41664832_cbroad203.jpg

ICC Match Referee Chris Broad has arrived back in England and speaking at a news conference in Manchester, he spoke of his shock, sadness and anger following the terrorist attacks that he was caught up in Lahore.

He went on to express disappointment that the high levels of security that had been promised by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) failed them when he and his colleagues needed it most.

Eight people were killed and several others, including Sri Lankan players, injured as around 14 gunmen attacked a convoy that was transporting the Sri Lankan squad and match officials to the Gaddafi Stadium yesterday (March 3rd).

Broad, the match referee for the game in Lahore, described his shock at what had happened, his sadness that people were injured and killed, paying tribute to the driver of the bus he was in who was killed, and his anger at the level of security provided by the Pakistan Cricket Board.

"I have three emotions going thur my body at the moment," he said shortly after arriving at Manchester airport. "The first one is shock - shock at the events that have taken place over the last 24 hours. I, like many people, naively thought that there was no way that terrorists would attack cricket; unfortunately that has changed and cricket has to do something about it. We have to try to put that right.

[Will you put that right, Imran Khan?]

"The other emotion is sadness. Clearly sadness for the injured and the killed in this incident, particularly sadness from my point of view for our driver, one of th loveliest men you could have ever wished to see. He always had a smile on his face. He was just doing his job, driving us to the cricket ground and he was murdered by people he didn't know.

"Clearly there's sadness for Abdul Sohail Khan, my liaison officer in Pakistan, he was hit by a bullet in the shoulder. And of course, the worst case was Ahsan Raza, our fourh umpire during this Test match who took a bullet. I was behind him on the floor of the van, bullets were flying all around us. I tried to comfort him, placed my hand on his back but he was clearly seriously injured.

Raza has reportedly had surgery on his injuries and is in a critical, but stable condition. Broad then went on to talk of how angry he was that the level of security promised by the PCB was not provided.

"My third emotion is anger. Anger at the Pakistani security forces. I had an inkling before this Test match leg of the tour that something might happen. I certainly didn't think that this was going to happen but I raised my concerns with the ICC before the tour started. They passed on my concerns to the PCB and the PCB assured me that all security would be taken care of.

"When we were in the van we weren't aware of what was going on outside. After the incicent we were able to see television pictures - you can quite clearly see the white van we were in next to the ambulance in the middle of this roundabout with terrorists shooting past the van, soemtimes into our van, and not a sign of a policeman anywhere. They had clearly gone, left the scene, and left us to be sitting ducks.


"I am extremely angry that we were promised high-level security and in our hour of need that security vanished."


http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/cricket/7923722.stm


http://www.cricketworld.com/sri_lanka_in_pakistan/article/?aid=19771


......

Cricket, what cricket?

Pakistan was still trying to absorb the criticism made by the English match referee Chris Broad of the security provided to the Sri Lankan cricket team on March 3, when the two Australian umpires, Simon Taufel and Steve Davis, charged that they were “abandoned” by Pakistani security forces when a dozen gunmen opened fire on them.

Taufel said: “You tell me why supposedly 25 armed commandos were in our convoy and when the team bus got going again we were left on our own. We were isolated, we were left alone, we were unaccounted for, we were not given the same security and the same attention as the playing staff were, I’m angry that when we were in our hour of need we were left on our own”.

There are other questions too which we have to answer as we celebrate our police heroes who laid down their lives but saved the Sri Lankan team from being kidnapped or killed on the spot. They cast doubt on the “intent” behind splitting the two teams in half and thereby halving the security for the Sri Lankans and the umpires who had got ready on time. Those who have been thanking the Providence for the “laziness” of the Pakistani team should pause to see how the world is criticising this mess-up.

The Sri Lankan team manager, Brendan Kuruppu, has brought this up in his remarks too. He said: “On that particular day we had a couple of outriders in front and three or four jeeps in front of us but because the Pakistan team did not come at the same time there was no security back-up from behind our convoy. Generally both teams leave together with the match officials as well in one convoy so we have security cover from all sides of the convoy”.

First, someone plants a crude analysis on CID about how RAW was going to kill the Sri Lankans. The CID swallowed it hook line and sinker. Then the police splits security in half and lets six of its personnel get killed while nothing is known of the action that a detail of over 20 elite force took if it did not run away. What it proves is that even if Pakistan is finally pacified its assurances of security will not be trustworthy for a long time. (Daily Times, 7 March 2009)
Read more...

Wednesday, 4 March 2009

Denial mode, yet again: The Attack on Sri Lankan Cricket Team and Our Response

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/huff-wires/20090303/as-pakistan-cricketers-attacked/images/1fd2a7ab-777c-4373-899a-8dba94db0484.jpg

Denial mode, yet again —Ejaz Haider

Predictably, some analysts have immediately put the blame on India. While at this stage no possibility can be ruled out, the fact remains that the responsibility for providing security to the Sri Lankan team was ours and we failed on that count

The only surprising factor in the Tuesday terror attack in Lahore is that the authorities did not anticipate it.

The security with the convoy was not geared towards responding to an ambush. In fact, the convoy was also vulnerable to other types of terrorist attacks — a possible IED (improvised explosive device) attack or even two suicide bombers strategically placed to ram explosives-laden vehicles into the convoy.

What does this tell us? The Lahore attack was a huge security failure at all levels — from poor intelligence to poor local protection for the convoy all along the route from the hotel to the stadium.

On the other hand, the attackers, according to what has been reported so far, were fully prepared. They struck on the morning of the third day of the Test, which means they had reconnoitred the route, surveilled the convoy, selected the point of attack, decided on the numbers they required and positioned themselves in a way that would allow them to fire at the convoy from multiple directions.

The point of attack, the Liberty roundabout, offered at least three advantages: the convoy would have to slowdown; the area is open and allows multiple positioning and open arcs of fire; and, the attackers could extricate in all directions after mounting the attack.

If the report that one of them first fired an RPG but missed is correct, then we should be thankful. The RPG hit would have left a different story behind it. But leaving aside what is known and is being constantly reported on TV channels, the question is simpler: Why this security lapse?

Pakistan has been trying its best, and for legitimate reasons, to convince cricket teams to come and play in Pakistan even as the terrorist threat in the country has steadily increased. Some teams have refused to play in Pakistan; Sri Lanka decided it would. Given how much we need teams to come and play here, given also the clear threat of terror attacks, the Sri Lankan team should have been provided the highest level of security at every point.

The team was most vulnerable while travelling between the hotel and the stadium. This means securing the route against all possibilities: suicide bombers, IEDs, snipers, ambush etc. Not only should all possible points of attack have been identified, those points should also have been secured. There should have been aerial patrolling, which was done after the attack had been mounted.

These are standard operating procedures in situations that call for high security. That situation, unless we want to deny it, now obtains in Pakistan. There is also the element of what kind of target the terrorist would want to take out. International concern and condemnation as also the objective of isolating Pakistan and showing the state to be weak-kneed are obvious objectives.

The Sri Lankan team thus made an ideal target and the authorities should have realised that. But they didn’t and nothing was done to secure the route on the ground or from the air ahead of the team’s movement.

We can now be sure that the International Cricket Council, which has called for a review of the status of the 2011 World Cup, would be averse to allowing Pakistan to host it. That’s another huge blow to us.

This is, of course, one aspect of this episode. But there is another which is even more troubling, namely whodunit.

Predictably, some analysts have immediately put the blame on India. While at this stage no possibility can be ruled out, the fact remains that the responsibility for providing security to the Sri Lankan team was ours and we failed on that count. Even very high security may not be enough at times to prevent a terrorist attack. But precisely for that reason security measures should be as sophisticated as possible and try to stay ahead of improvisations by the terrorist outfits.

President Zardari’s praise for the courage of the policemen who died in the attack is an appropriate gesture but does not take away the fact — in fact highlights it — that proper security measures would have helped avoid the attack and save lives as well as Pakistan’s already battered image.

Second, if India is indeed behind this, its intelligence agencies should be commended for getting recruits from within Pakistan to mount an attack on the Sri Lankan team. Given how late the Sri Lankan team decided to play the Test in Lahore and the logistics and other requirements for mounting such an operation, the Indians didn’t have much time to put this together — in which case, if these analysts are to be believed, India seems to have done an impressive job.

The worst thing that can happen to a state is to go into denial. How long will we deny that we have groups that have run amok and whose obvious agenda involves destroying Pakistan as a nation-state? These are ideologically motivated millenarians, ahistorical in their approach and literalist in their outlook. They are trained, and societal attitudes transformed over three decades allow them to find recruits with alarming ease.

To point to India (‘khufia haath’ — hidden hand) without bothering to look at other evidence for which we now have a long trajectory, is not simply ignorance; it is deliberate perfidy.

While improving intelligence gathering for pre-emption and security procedures for tackling a threat are issues that need to be immediately addressed in terms of increasing capacity, the broader issue is linked to our societal attitudes. This is an area where the role of the media becomes crucial.

So far there has been no debate on this within the media, at least not in any structured manner. There are channels, anchors and a “select” group of analysts always at hand that, in conjunction, reinforce existing biases through obvious distortions, weaving a tapestry of conspiracies. What should be done about them?

Here’s the question: Should they be allowed to spread this poison on the basis of “freedom of speech”? Would this not be akin to allowing someone with a gun to start shooting on the basis of “freedom of action”?

Carl Schmitt, the controversial German philosopher and jurist, writing during the twilight of the Weimer Republic, was arguing that parties and entities opposed to the principles enshrined in the Constitution should not be allowed to operate. The liberals were opposed to his viewpoint. But that misplaced liberalism resulted in a transformation that led Germany into a period from which the Germans are still trying to recover.

Would we like to go that way or should we begin to ask ourselves some hard and tough questions regarding what it is that we want as a nation? It doesn’t seem to me that we are even clear on the issue of whether we are a nation-state in the modern sense. That requires self-reflection, not pointing fingers at others and distorting facts.

The attack has done its damage. But if something positive can come out of it, there may be less sense of waste, after all.

Ejaz Haider is Op-Ed Editor of Daily Times and Consulting Editor of The Friday Times. He can be reached at sapper@dailytimes.com.pk

.....

انتہاپسندی اور جلدبازی کے تجزیے


پاکستانی اخبارات(فائل فوٹو)
پاکستان کے ذرائع ابلاغ اور کچھ سیاسی حلقوں میں انتہا پسندی کے عذرخواہوں کی کوئی کمی نہیں
لاہور لبرٹی چوک میں سری لنکا کرکٹ ٹیم پر ہونے والے حملے کے چند ہی منٹ بعد ایک ٹی وی چینل پر ایک معروف ریٹائرڈ لیفٹیننٹ جنرل کا براہ راست انٹرویو نشر کیا گیا جنھوں نے حملے کے قلابے ممبئی کے دہشت گرد حملوں سے ملاتے ہوئے خیال ظاہر کیا کہ سری لنکا کی کرکٹ ٹیم پر حملہ بھارتی خفیہ ایجنسی را کی طرف سے ممبئی حملوں کا انتقام ہے۔

اس ابتدائی اشارے کے بعد پاکستان کے نجی ٹیلی ویژن چینلوں کا رُخ ممبئی حملوں اور پھر بھارت کے ممکنہ انتقامی کردار کی طرف مُڑ گیا۔ بہت کم تجزیہ کاروں نے اِس نکتے پر توجہ دی کہ اگر ممبئی حملوں اور لاہور کے لبرٹی چوک میں دہشت گردی کے طریقہ واردات میں مماثلت پائی جاتی ہے تو اس سے یہ نتیجہ نکالنا کہیں زیادہ قرینِ قیاس ہے کہ یہ واردات بھی غالباً اُسی تنظیم کا کام ہے جس نے ممبئی حملوں کی منصوبہ بندی کی تھی۔

بغیر کسی ٹھوس ثبوت کے ہمسایہ ملک پر سازش کا الزام لگانے کا مقصد لاہور میں حملے کے مرتکب افراد کی نشاندہی سے زیادہ اُن کی طرف سے توجہ ہٹانا معلوم ہوتا تھا۔

خوف و ہراس
لاہور میں تھیٹروں اور دیگر تفریحی مقامات پر متعدد دھماکے کیے گئے جن میں جانی نقصان کا اندیشہ زیادہ نہیں تھا لیکن خوف و ہراس میں خاصا اضافہ ہوا۔ کرکٹ کے کھیل پر حملہ اِسی رجحان کا اگلا مرحلہ سمجھنا چاہیے۔ اب کئی برس تک کوئی بین الاقوامی کرکٹ ٹیم پاکستان نہیں آئے گی۔ سیاحت کا دروازہ ایک عرصے سے بند ہو چکا ہے۔ پاکستان کی عالمی تنہائی بڑھ رہی ہے اور داخلی استحکام مخدوش ہو رہا ہے
پاکستان کے ذرائع ابلاغ اور کچھ سیاسی حلقوں میں انتہا پسندی کے عذرخواہوں کی کوئی کمی نہیں۔ اِن حلقوں کا آزمودہ طریقہ کار انتہا پسندی کی کسی واردات کے بعد ایسی دھول اُڑانا ہے جس سے واردات کے مرتکب عناصر سے توجہ ہٹ جائے اور رائے عامہ کو انتہا پسندی کے مفروضہ اسباب اور سازشی نظریات میں اُلجھا دیا جائے۔

یہ اصحاب اِس امر کی نشاندہی کرنے میں تو بہت دلچسپی رکھتے ہیں کہ انتہا پسندی کی پشت پناہی کون کر رہا ہے لیکن یہ بیان کرنے سے ہچکچاہتے ہیں کہ ایسی کارروائیاں در حقیقت کون کر رہا ہے؟ یہ طریقہ کار انتہاپسندوں کے لیے نہایت مفید مطلب ہے۔

ابتدائی غبار بیٹھنے کے کچھ عرصہ بعد انتہا پسند تنظیمیں واقعے کی ذمہ داری قبول کر لیتی ہیں۔ ڈنمارک کے سفارت خانے یا میریٹ ہوٹل پر حملوں کے فوراً بعد تواتر سے بیرونی ہاتھ کا ذکررہا ۔ کچھ عرصہ بعد القاعدہ نے تسلیم کر لیا کہ دونوں مقامات پر اس کے فرستادہ اراکین نے حملے کیے تھے۔

دہشت گردی کی کسی بھی واردات کے بعد رائے عامہ میں انتہاپسندوں کے خلاف شدید نفرت پیدا ہونا لازمی امر ہے۔ جھوٹ یا تاویل آرائی کی مدد سے اس ممکنہ نفرت کو دبانا کسی بھی انتہا پسند کی حکمت عملی کا حصہ ہے۔

ایک نکتہ یہ بھی اُٹھایا گیا کہ القاعدہ یا اِس کی ذیلی تنظیمیں سری لنکا کو نشانہ کیوں بنائیں گی؟ اِس استدلال میں بنیاد پرست انتہا پسندی کی نوعیت کو سرے سے نظر اندازکر دیا گیا۔ القاعدہ یا اُس کی حلیف تنظیموں کو فلسطین، کشمیر یا افغانستان سے کوئی خصوصی تعلق نہیں ۔

1998ءمیں القاعدہ نے مغربی دنیا کے خلاف جہاد کا فتویٰ جاری کیا تو اُس میں فلسطین یا کشمیر کا ذکر تک نہیں تھا۔ بنیاد پرستوں کا اصل مقصد اپنی ہدف سرزمینوں اور بالآخر پوری دنیا پر اپنا تصور مذہب اور اُس سے پھوٹنے والا تصور سیاست مسلط کرنا ہے۔ اس راہ میں بُدھا کے مجسمے تباہ کیے جا سکتے ہیں اور اہلِ تشیع مسلمانوں پر حملے بھی ہو سکتے ہیں۔

القاعدہ منشور
1998ءمیں القاعدہ نے مغربی دنیا کے خلاف جہاد کا فتویٰ جاری کیا تو اُس میں فلسطین یا کشمیر کا ذکر تک نہیں تھا۔ بنیاد پرستوں کا اصل مقصد اپنی ہدف سرزمینوں اور بالآخر پوری دنیا پر اپنا تصور مذہب اور اُس سے پھوٹنے والا تصور سیاست مسلط کرنا ہے۔ اس راہ میں بُدھا کے مجسمے تباہ کیے جا سکتے ہیں اور اہلِ تشیع مسلمانوں پر حملے بھی ہو سکتے ہیں
انتہا پسند کسی قوم یاگروہ کا اس لیے مخالف نہیں کہ مذکورہ قوم یا گروہ نے اُسے کوئی نقصان پہنچایا ہے۔ ان کے تصور عالم میں ہر وہ فرد، گروہ اور قوم اُس کی دشمن اور جائز ہدف ہے جو اُس سے مختلف ہے یا اُس کے دستِ وحشت خیز پر بیعت کے لیے تیار نہیں۔

لاہور میں حملے کے بعد ایک سوال یہ اُٹھا کہ انتہا پسند کرکٹ کے کھلاڑیوں کو کیوں نشانہ بنائیں گے؟ اِس دلیل میں یہ مفروضہ کار فرما ہے کہ یہ لوگ کرکٹ جیسے معصوم شغل سے کیوں کِد رکھیں گے۔ اِس میں یہ حقیقت فراموش کی جا رہی ہے کہ انتہا پسندی بنیادی انسانی معصومیت ہی کی دشمن ہے۔ ہدف جس قدر معصوم ہو دہشت گردی اُسی قدر موثر قرار پاتی ہے۔ دہشت گردی کا مقصد خوف زدہ کرنا ہے۔ ایک بالغ انسان کی مصیبت کے مقابلے میں کسی معصوم بچے کی اذیت زیادہ دہشت ناک ہوتی ہے۔

یوں بھی اب سے پچیس برس پہلے ڈاکٹر اسرار احمد نے کرکٹ کو فُحش کھیل قرار دیا تھا۔ واضح رہے کہ اُن دنوں تحریک انصاف کے رہنما عمران خان قومی کرکٹ ٹیم کے کپتان تھے۔ طالبان کے افغانستان میں گیند سے کھیلنے والے بچوں پر تشدد کیا جاتا تھا۔ بات کرکٹ کی معصومیت یا کھلاڑیوں کی غیر سیاسی شناخت کی نہیں، انتہا پسند اپنے مقاصد کے حصول کے لیے کوئی بھی راستہ اختیار کر سکتے ہیں۔

انتہا پسند پاکستان کے شمال مغربی سرحدی صوبے میں اپنے پنجے موثر طور پر گاڑ چکے ہیں۔ اگلا منطقی ہدف پنجاب ہے۔ اقتصادی اور سیاسی طور پر پسماندہ سرائیکی خطے میں فرقہ واریت کا ہتھیار موثر ثابت ہو سکتا ہے۔ چنانچہ ڈیرہ غازی خان، میانوالی اور بھکر جیسے علاقوں میں فرقہ وارانہ کشیدگی کا گراف بلند کیا جا رہا ہے۔

مرکزی پنجاب کو دھڑکا
مرکزی پنجاب میں شہری متوسط طبقہ کو یہ دھڑکا ہے کہ ان کی اقتصادی خوشحالی پنجاب کے دیگر حصوں کو کھٹکتی ہے۔ چنانچہ مرکزی پنجاب میں انتہا پسندوں نے ہراول دستے کے طور پر ایسی کارروائیاں شروع کی ہیں جنھیں بظاہر انتہاپسندی کے بڑے دھارے سے منسوب کرنا مشکل نظر آتا ہے
مرکزی پنجاب میں شہری متوسط طبقہ کو یہ دھڑکا ہے کہ ان کی اقتصادی خوشحالی پنجاب کے دیگر حصوں کو کھٹکتی ہے۔ چنانچہ مرکزی پنجاب میں انتہا پسندوں نے ہراول دستے کے طور پر ایسی کارروائیاں شروع کی ہیں جنھیں بظاہر انتہاپسندی کے بڑے دھارے سے منسوب کرنا مشکل نظر آتا ہے۔

لاہور میں تھیٹروں اور دیگر تفریحی مقامات پر متعدد دھماکے کیے گئے جن میں جانی نقصان کا اندیشہ زیادہ نہیں تھا لیکن خوف و ہراس میں خاصا اضافہ ہوا۔ کرکٹ کے کھیل پر حملہ اِسی رجحان کا اگلا مرحلہ سمجھنا چاہیے۔ اب کئی برس تک کوئی بین الاقوامی کرکٹ ٹیم پاکستان نہیں آئے گی۔ سیاحت کا دروازہ ایک عرصے سے بند ہو چکا ہے۔ پاکستان کی عالمی تنہائی بڑھ رہی ہے اور داخلی استحکام مخدوش ہو رہا ہے۔

پاکستان کو انتہاپسندی سے شدید خطرہ لاحق ہے۔ مشکل یہ ہے کہ پاکستان میں سیاسی قیادت، ریاستی ادارے اور رائے عامہ اس خطرے کا مقابلہ کرنے میں پوری طرح یکسو نہیں ہیں۔


Also read:

Shaheryar Ali: Lahore Attacks: Mumbai Deja Vu


Read more...