Editor's Choice

Featured Post

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


Monday, 13 April 2009

TTP Swat Threatens to Kill MPs Opposing their Brand of Shariah !!!

President Asif Ali Zardari on Sunday referred the draft Nizam-e-Adl Regulation, 2009 to Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, advising him to table it before parliament for debate prior to its implementation. Meanwhile both TTP & TNSM have said that MPs opposing to the so-called Nizam-e-Adl Regulation, 2009 would be declared "non-Muslims" !
Spokesman of TTP Swat even threatened to kill MPs opposing their brand of Shariah. He said "that any NA member opposing the regulation would contest the next election “if he remained alive” !!!!!

Maulana Sufi Muhammad founder and chief of TNSM.

Haji Muslim Khan spokesman of TTP Swat.

TNSM, Taliban warn MPs against opposing Nizam-e-Adl

MINGORA: The Tanzim Nifaz Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM) and the Swat Taliban on Sunday warned parliamentarians against opposing the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation in the National Assembly.
“Even holy prophets had no authority to make religious laws or amend them, then how can the National Assembly do it?” TNSM spokesman Amir Izzat Khan told The News.
“If members of the National Assembly opposed the judicial system of the Shariat-e-Muhammadi, they will enter the category of non-Muslims and Pakistan will become Darul Harb,” he warned.
Explaining Darul Harb, he said when the rulers of a country opposed the Shariah, they did not remain Muslims anymore. “So a country with non-Muslims as its rulers becomes Darul Harb,” he said and added that it made Jihad mandatory on rulers.
Muslim Khan, the spokesman for the Swat militants, warned that those opposing the Nizam-e-Adl would be declared Murtad or apostate. “Then, he or she should contest election on minority seat, if he or she remains alive,” he said.
He urged the government to enforce the Shariah as soon as possible and establish authorised Qazi courts. He claimed they were peaceful people and stood for calm and tranquillity.Amir Izzat said enforcement of the Nizam-e-Adl was their constitutional right. “This country was also acquired in the name of Islam, then why Islamic system should not be enforced here,” he questioned.
He urged members of the National Assembly to force President Zardari into signing the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation for the implementation of the Islamic system.

The News --- 13th April, 09

MPs apostate if oppose Adl: TTP

MINGORA: Any member of the National Assembly (NA) opposes the Nizam-e-Adl Regulation in the assembly will be an apostate and will be allowed to contest the next election from minority seats, the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) Swat and the Tehreek Nifaz-e-Shariat-e-Muhammadi (TNSM) separately said on Sunday.

TTP Swat spokesman Muslim Khan told reporters that any NA member opposing the regulation would contest the next election “if he remained alive”.

TNSM spokesman Amir Izzat told reporters that any member of the NA opposing the regulation during the debate in the assembly would be declared non-Muslim.

Daily Times ---- 13th April, 09


Daily Express ---- 13th April, 09

1 comment:

Aamir Mughal said...

These Rampant Mullahs are themselves Kaafir because they are openly Issuing Fatwa of Takfeer [Haram] against Muslims:

1 - The Takfiris make unlicensed Takfeer of Governments and scholars and call the common-folk to bloody revolution as a way to remove such governments and establish Islaamic Law.


2- Al-Khawaarij


3- Characteristics of Al-Khawaarij


4- Khawarij Renewed Indeology.


“The judgement of apostasy and expelling someone from the religion is only appropriate for the people of knowledge who are firmly grounded in knowledge, and they are the judges in the various Sharee’ah law courts, and those who are able of giving legal verdicts. And this is just like the other matters, and it is not the right of every person, or from the right of those who are learning, or those who ascribe themselves to knowledge, but who have deficiency in understanding. It is not appropriate for them to make judgements of apostasy (upon others). Since, mischief will arise from this, and sometimes a Muslim might be judged as an apostate but he is not actually so. And the takfir of a Muslim who has not committed one of the nullifications of Islaam contains great danger. Whoever says to his brother “O Kaafir” or “O Faasiq”, and he is not like that, then the words will fall back upon the one who said them. Hence, the ones who actually judge with apostasy are the legislative judges and those who are able and fit for giving legal verdicts. And as for those who enforce the judgements they are the leaders of the Muslims (wullaat al-amr). As for whatever is other than this, then it is mere confusion.”

“Meting out the punishments is only appropriate for the leader of the Muslims and it is not for every person to establish the punishment, since confusion, and corruption necessarily follows from this, and also the cutting off of the society, tribulations and provocations occur. Establishing the punishments is appropriate (i.e. befits only) to the Muslim leader. The Prophet (sallallaahu alaihi wasallam) said, “Pardon each other for the punishments that are between you, but when the execution of the punishment reaches the [authority of the] Sultaan, then Allaah curses both the one who seeks intercession and the one who grants the intercession [i.e. to revoke the punishment]”. And from the responsibilities of the Sultaan in Islaam, and from those matters that befit him is the establishment of the punishments after they have been established legislatively, via the Sharee’ah law courts, upon the one who fell into the crime for which the legislator has designated a specific punishment, such as for stealing. So what has been said is that establishing the punishments (i.e. meting them out) is from the rights of the Sultaan, and when the Muslims do not have a Sultaan amongst them, then they should just suffice with commanding the good and forbidding the evil, and calling to Allaah, the Might and Majestic, with wisdom, good admonition and arguing with that which is best. And it is not permissible for individuals (in the society) to establish the hudood, since that, as we have mentioned, will bring about chaos, and also provocations, and tribulations will arise, and this contains greater corruption than it contains rectification. And from amongst the Sharee’ah principles that are submitted to is, “Repelling the harmful things takes precedence over bringing about the beneficial things”.

Post a Comment

1. You are very welcome to comment, more so if you do not agree with the opinion expressed through this post.

2. If you wish to hide your identity, post with a pseudonym but don't select the 'anonymous' option.

3. Copying the text of your comment may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in posting.