Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Friday, 21 November 2008

Sharif Badmash: An Overview of Corruption of Nawaz Sharif and Shahbaz Sharif



This site has moved to http://criticalppp.com/archives/476, click this link if you are not redirected

1 comment:

Raazi said...

SC verdict deems Nawaz ‘dishonest’ person

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court (SC) released a detailed judgement of its verdict to disqualify the Sharif brothers from holding public office on Saturday. Terming Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) chief Nawaz Sharif as dishonest, and “not sagacious”, the verdict said he had been convicted by the Accountability Court under Section 9-A(V) in Reference No 2 of 2000, and under Section 10 of the NAB Ordinance, 1999 for dishonesty, corruption and corrupt practices. It said Nawaz had been publicly defaming the judiciary and the armed forces of Pakistan, adding cases for recovery of loans taken by the PML-N chief were still pending before the Lahore High Court. In the case of Shahbaz, the court said he was still a fugitive from law, as loans obtained by him and his family members remained unpaid. It said that Shahbaz had also defamed and ridiculed the judiciary and could not be considered righteous. The verdict said the acceptance of the Shahbaz’s nomination papers was legally unsustainable and had been set aside.

22 March 2009

http://dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2009\03\22\story_22-3-2009_pg1_2

Post a Comment

1. You are very welcome to comment, more so if you do not agree with the opinion expressed through this post.

2. If you wish to hide your identity, post with a pseudonym but don't select the 'anonymous' option.

3. Copying the text of your comment may save you the trouble of re-writing if there is an error in posting.