Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Showing posts with label Sugar Mills. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sugar Mills. Show all posts

Tuesday, 10 November 2009

Sugar Fiasco

Posted by: Jarri Mirza
Guest blog by: Humza Ikram


The recent sugar fiasco shows the volatile civil administrative structure of our society. In terms of western capitalist economist point of view it’s a result of non-documented trade which exists in our trade culture and lack decision making in real time environment. But the even worse part of the story is our reaction to the problem.

A very bad trend has emerged in the society where whenever a problem occur in the country suddenly everyone becomes a Prophet and the television anchors becomes the chosen one who gets the revelation from God. And then race starts every anchors tries to prove his revelation is real and pure and other tries to prove his God is real and he doubts the others God’s actual existence. This happened in the series of event his happened in recent history.

Right from the Lal Masjid episode these TV anchors tried to outdo the others. And one anchor (Kamran Khan) did the unimaginable he tried to offer mediation between the cleric and government official. And thank to him we saw 24/7 reality television like no where in world. Same pattern can be observed in the event followed that like Lawyers movement, Brigader Imitiaz episode, High treason case against musharaf, minus one formula and even the administrative issues like Petrol development levy (PDL) issue and the recent sugar crises.

When some liberal writers and commentator used to advise them not to glorify Taliban; they termed them as a western agent like in the case of Prof. Pervez HoodBhoy and social commentator Nadeem Farooq Paracha. And I remember when BB raised her voice against lal masjid activities and showed her concern we saw round the clock television analyzes why BB is raising her voice from London on these innocent Muslim missionaries.

From these patterns you can conclude one thing and to describe that I want to Quote Colin Powell famous telephone call to Musharaf “either you are with us or against”. Same goes for these television anchors. These television anchors are authority on law, business, investment, security, defense, diplomacy you name it they know everything and trust me they do their home very well you can which can be seen in recent case of national embarrassment because of Talat Hussain’s stupid arguments with Hilary because of his incorrect stats . Thank God Zaid Hamid was not in the panel.

The even worse phenomena which is developing is the superior courts are also following the act of the media and respected judges are trying to become like chief economist of the country that can be seen with carbon surcharge case which was part of this budget and which also the only few unanimous budgets of our history like the year 2008-09. Which was later challenged by PML_N in the Supreme Court on the second thought after they voted for it the parliament days before that after they were humiliated by TV anchors of showing impotency while passing the budget? And Supreme Court judges acted like the chief economist of country.

Let us analyze the recent sugar crisis and the role of media, government and judiciary.

WEEK 1: TCP delayed the decision to import sugar to benefit some key politician.
Stance of media and which was later adopted by Punjab government: it’s the negligence of federal government what can we do.

WEEK 2: key politician are hoarding sugar. Punjab government responded quickly and started series of operation on mills and distributors .they received acclaimed from all over Pakistan and media teams even started to count the quantity of sugar collected by Punjab Government each day and one poor lady TV anchor even said in one of her program if Punjab government can confiscate four months of required sugar for Pakistan in a week whether we actually required to import sugar. Later news reports suggest PML-N MPA’s were storing sugar at the places and report of Sheikh Mumtaz Hashmi and his brother in law involved in hoarding 600 bags of sugar, story become instant hit at youtube and social networking sites like Facebook.

WEEK 3: Peshawar and Lahore High courts took suo mou moto action against hoarding.

WEEK 4: week four ended with all kinds of speculation what could be the court judgment.

WEEK 5: finally the wait was over the courts announced there decision.

Client features of court decision
• NWFP government should look into smugglings of sugar to Afghanistan. (this remarks actually negates the LHC remarks if Punjab government is failed to stop inter-provincial smuggling of sugar how could NWFP could stop smuggling of sugar to Afghanistan where price is huge as compare to Punjab TO NWFP and where NWFP does not have control over Tribal Areas since there is no provincial police.

• There was no actual shortage of sugar.
• LHC CJ khawaja sharif suggested to bring back nationalization of sugar mills if sugar mills , not actually confronting his argument but I want to remind him he was previously Attorney general of Zia in Punjab and his previous boss and mentor Zia use to say “Socialism is haram”.

• Most astonishing was the LHC out did the PHC they also calculated the price ex mill price of the sugar.


WEEK 6: Week six provide to be the contradiction of week 1 now all the brilliant TV commentators were convinced that there was no sugar shortage in the country and funny part is if they are now convinced that there is no sugar shortage why the media brigade humiliated Watoo?

WEEK 7: Sugar mill association went to Supreme Court because they felt court didn’t listen to them and announced the decision in haste.

Current situation sugar have reached from 47 to 100 at some please since the courts intervention which halted the normal market mechanism and actually give provided the environment for the opportunist for hoarding and to earn quick buck .and the million dollar question is where is all the sugar which Punjab government confiscated.




WEEK 9: from late decision of importing sugar to no sugar shortages we have reached the debate of good governance mixed with kerry lugar bill, NRO and other legislative issue to finally stage which can be described in article of Shaheen Shebai “have counted already started ?”To suggest Asif Ali Zardari’s days at presidency are over.”

In my opinion media did not bother to address the real problem they are actually running a campaign to show governments inability to run the state affairs. My suggestion we should once and for all have to decide whether we will remain hostage to their 24/7 campaign or try to understand things objectively.

Read more...

Thursday, 5 November 2009

A specimen of Shahbaz Sharif's good governance: Cheeni Naheen Hay



Read more...

Friday, 25 September 2009

Nawaz Sharif, Shahbaz Sharif and the Sugar Crisis in Pakistan


More than 50 percent sugar mills in Pak owned by politicians
August 23rd, 2009 - 6:22 pm ICT by ANI

Islamabad, Aug.23 (ANI): More than 50 percent of sugar mills in Pakistan are owned by political leaders, and despite this fact, sugar prices in the country have sky rocketed in the recent past, increasing problems for the people, especially in the month of Ramazan.

According to sources, there are 78 sugar mills in the country and the political leaders or their relatives or partners own more than 50 per cent of these factories.

Insiders said that there are at least six mills owned by President Asif Ali Zardari’s family members and other PPP leaders.

They also revealed that former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s family members own nine sugar factories situated in different part of the country, most of them in Punjab province.

While the government has claimed that it would look that the sugar prices in the country do not exceed a limit, people believe it is difficult to bring down the prices and they would continue to suffer.

“When the government says that it will catch the culprits and provide sugar to the masses on affordable rates, it is like throwing dust in the eyes of masses”, The Nation quoted one Islamabad resident, as saying on conditions of anonymity.

“After all who were the ultimate beneficiaries of the meetings held between sugar mills owners and the government?” he asked.

The prime reason behind the sudden steep rise in the price of one of the most important daily commodity is a calculated strategy chalked out by major players of the sugar industry with help from important government personalities.

According to sources, the sugar mafia in the country has undermined orders from the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) and has manipulated decision-making at the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) to achieve the mischievous target of increasing the sugar prices.

The command with which this mafia works can be gauged from the fact that ECC’s order to release sugar at a controlled price of 38 rupees per kilogram through ration stores and utility shops is yet to be implemented and people have no choice but to shell out 55 to 60 rupees for a kilogram of sugar.

This is not the first time that sugar prices have reached sky high in Pakistan. During former President General Pervez Musharraf’s regime sugar prices had touched the then peak of 35 rupees per kilogram.A probe was ordered against the political big wigs close to the Musharraf government at that time. However, charges were dropped later on Musharraf’s personal request.

Observers believe that the current scam would also subside with time forcing Pakistanis to spend much more on sugar this Ramzan. (ANI)

http://www.thaindian.com/newsportal/south-asia/more-than-50-percent-sugar-mills-in-pak-owned-by-politicians_100236802.html

Sugar Mills of Sharif Brothers exposed in Capital Talk -

See Hanif Abbasi (Jamaatia Munafiq) hypocritically defending his masters.

....
Sugar price

Friday, September 25, 2009

SC refuses to suspend LHC verdict ;Rejects pleas against order ; NAB report on sugar crisis presented in court; SBP gave sugar mills loans worth Rs55 billion out of which Rs21bn still outstanding, apex court told


By Sohail Khan

ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Thursday rejected pleas of the sugar mills associations to suspend the order of the Lahore High Court that had fixed the price of sugar at Rs40 per kilogram.

Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry, who heads the two-member bench of the apex court hearing identical petitions of the sugar mills associations against the LHC verdict, said the sugar price would remain Rs40 a kilogram.

The Pakistan Sugar Mills’ Association (PSMA), the Punjab Sugar Dealers’ Association (PSDA) and the federal and provincial governments had moved the Supreme Court against the September 3 verdict of the Lahore High Court (LHC) that had fixed retail price of sugar at Rs40 per kilogram.

They had prayed to the apex court to suspend the LHC verdict till the decision of the petitions. The Lahore High Court (LHC) on September 3, 2009 while taking suo motu notice of the sugar crisis in Punjab had fixed the retail price of sugar at Rs40 per kilogram.

In compliance with the court’s earlier direction, the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) on Thursday presented a report prepared two years back on the sugar crisis. The report, prepared on February 17, 2006, stated that the bureau had carried out only preliminary investigation into the crisis but various quarters raised a lot of hue and cry giving the impression that NAB’s inquiry was contributing to further escalation of the sugar prices. This forced the NAB to close the inquiry, the report stated.

The report further stated the sugar industry in the country was predominantly owned by politicians, who despite being in government, acted contrary to the laws and ethics of business and held sugar stock which is tantamount to hoarding.

The report also contains a list of mills owned by politicians that hoarded thousands of metric tons of sugar during the 2006 crisis.It also states that there was a clear-cut position drawn by sugar mills owned by politicians and farmer associations while the government remained in a fix and lacked resolve to bridge the gap between the two stakeholders.

According to the NAB report of 2006, major ownership of the country’s sugar mills industry was in the hands of politicians who hoarded the commodity, which caused the sugar crisis.The report issued on February 17, 2006 also listed names of politicians who own sugar mills. They included Asif Ali Zardari (3 mills), the Sharif brothers (12 mills), Humayun Akhtar Khan, Chaudhry Shujaat Hussain, Mian Azhar, Mian Altaf Salim, Jehangir Tarin, Haroon Akhtar, Anwar Cheema and Nasrullah Dreshak.

A report submitted by the State Bank before the apex court stated that during January 2009, the banks gave sugar mills loans worth Rs55 billion of which Rs21 billion are still to be paid by the mills.

The court adjourned the hearing till October 1, as other parties in the case including the federal and provincial governments, the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP), the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) and the PSMA requested for more time to present reports that the Supreme Court had sought on the previous hearing of the case.

The chief justice also directed PSMA President Iskander Khan to present a copy of the letter he had written to Federal Minister for Food and Agriculture Nazar Muhammad Gondal on June 16, 2009.

Responding to an inquiry by the chief justice, Khan said he had written to the minister that they had sugar stock of two million metric tons. The chief justice reminded him that he had also written to the minister that the PSMA had sugar stock sufficient up to December 2009.

During the course of proceedings, the chief justice observed that the court had not barred anyone from crushing sugarcane.The Punjab government in its reply to the Supreme Court on fixing the sugar prices said the country is facing the crisis because the Trading Corporation of Pakistan (TCP) failed to import the commodity in time.

It further stated that the sugar dealers sold 63 per cent of their stock in the first nine months while 37 per cent stock was hoarded for profiteering prior to the beginning of the crushing season. It said no formal inquiry was conducted on a report based on NAB investigation and the Supreme Court, taking suo motu action, dismissed the case on January 24, 2008.
http://www.thenews.com.pk/top_story_detail.asp?Id=24684
.....

PML-N rejects NAB report on sugar

Friday, 25 Sep, 2009
How can the Sharifs be held responsible for the sugar crisis in 2006 when they were in exile: says Senator Pervaiz Rashid.

LAHORE: Senator Pervaiz Rashid has said the National Accountability Bureau report about involving the Sharif brothers in 2006-07 sugar crisis was to stop the return of PML-N leaders to Pakistan and a tactic to blackmail them.

Commenting on the NAB report published after three years, the senator said that it was an era of dictatorship when the PML-N had issued a schedule of the All Parties Conference, Charter of Democracy and return of Nawaz Sharif to the country.

According to a press release issued here on Thursday, he said that all these tactics were adopted to create hurdles in the return of the exiled politicians.

He said the report about the sugar crisis against the PML-N leaders was a part of the character assassination campaign launched by the dictator.

It was the period when former president Pervez Musharraf was feared of public reaction against him and was not ready to give permission to prominent opposition leaders to play their political role, he said.

‘How can the Sharifs be held responsible for the sugar crisis in 2006 when they were in exile’, he questioned and added that they were not even allowed to perform funeral rituals of their father by the dictator.

The senator said that Shahbaz Sharif was also not allowed to participate in the marriage ceremony of his daughter.

Mr Rashid said when Shahbaz Sharif came to Pakistan he was sent back to Saudi Arabia through another plane despite clear orders of the Supreme Court.

He said most of such cooked up reports, which were prepared only to please the higher authorities, were proved wrong in the court.

He said why the government at that time did not dare to publish the report about the sugar crisis if irregularities were identified in it.

The senator said the Sharif brothers had never been involved in hoarding or anti-people policies and the public support given to them in the last general election was a proof of the fact.



Read more...