Editor's Choice

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Featured Post
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Let us build Pakistan" has moved.
30 November 2009

All archives and posts have been transferred to the new location, which is: http://criticalppp.com

We encourage you to visit our new site. Please don't leave your comments here because this site is obsolete. You may also like to update your RSS feeds or Google Friend Connect (Follow the Blog) to the new location. Thank you.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Showing posts with label Journalist. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Journalist. Show all posts

Friday, 23 October 2009

7 Months, 10 Days in Taliban's Captivity: Story of David Rohde

Here is a five-part series offering a first-person account by David Rohde of his seven months as a captive of the Taliban in Pakistan. Mr. Rohde, a New York Times reporter, was kidnapped with two Afghan colleagues on Nov. 10, 2008, as they traveled to an interview with a Taliban commander outside of Kabul, Afghanistan.

The articles are based on Mr. Rohde’s recollections and, where possible, records kept by his family and colleagues. For safety reasons, certain names and details have been withheld.


7 Months, 10 Days in Captivity

Inside the Islamic Emirate

‘You Have Atomic Bombs, but We Have Suicide Bombers.’

A Drone Strike and Dwindling Hope

A Rope and a Prayer

Epilogue



A comment:

By humayun, vancouver, Washington, October 22nd, 2009

Several hundred comments – covering the entire spectrum from appreciative to trivial – have been made on Mr. Rohde’s series. The large number of comments shows the high degree of interest in understanding and defeating the Taliban. Personally, I greatly admire this remarkable and brave first-person account of a very rare event. I am glad Mr. Rohde, that you are safe with your wife, family, and friends.

Mr. Rohde’s observations and interactions with his captors are truly enlightening. It help understand the actual workings of the terrorists’ mind. This remarkable series show that the Taliban have well established infrastructure, communication and support networks that effectively fulfill their needs and are carried out in full view of the Pakistani army. This is contrary to the media’s image portraying them as bands of thugs that can be taken out by the Pakistani army. One of the more remarkable observations in the series describes how the terrorists motivate, recruit and retain dedicated foot soldiers. This is essential for any effective strategy to defeat this highly motivated and vicious enemy.

What stands out from Mr. Rohde’s observations is the obvious brain washing and continued isolation of the Taliban from the rest of the world. The frequent exposure of his captors to the propaganda videos, outright rejection of alternate ideas in spite of access to the Internet and satellite phones, condemnation of non-Muslims who are considered unclean, concepts of apostasy, etc. – all justified as part of the Islamic faith – should serve as eye openers for us all. Sadly, the terrorists and radicals propagate convoluted and wrong concepts of jihad and sharia based on selective and misrepresented reading of Qur’an – the Islamic scripture. Unfortunately, their misrepresentations are accepted by the Muslim world who, while rejecting specific acts of terror against Muslims, sympathizes with the Taliban when their atrocities are directed towards non-Muslims. This sympathy generates support amongst the “regular folks’ who have a higher propensity towards becoming radicalized.

Any successful strategy to defeat the Taliban must aim at breaking the unholy link between the Islamic scripture and the terrorists’ flawed concepts. This must come from the Muslims themselves who have allowed the political clergy to propagate such views unchallenged. I view these as the most important lessons from Mr. Rohde’s series.

Read more...

Sunday, 15 March 2009

Zardari bans Geo? A critical analysis by Tahir Sarwar Mir



....
15 March, KARACHI: Cable Operators Association of Pakistan (COAP) alleged Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (PEMRA) of serving illegal show cause notices sans authenticity to cable operators over banning Geo News transmission. They also noted that Geo TV was trying gain cheap popularity by creating the ban hype while the TV channel was not blocked by any cable operator.


...



Read more...

Saturday, 21 February 2009

Hamid Mir: Taliban are killing 'non-conforming' jorunalists by declaring them as spies...

Musa’s slaying scares reporters away from Swat
Saturday, February 21, 2009 (The News)
By By Hamid Mir

MINGORA: “The pen is mightier than the sword” is a phrase we learnt at school. Unfortunately, the dangerous situation in Swat has changed this idiom, which should now read something like this: “The gun is mightier than the pen.” The truth is always bitter and difficult to digest.

The murder of brave journalist Musa Khankhel in the volatile valley has discouraged many who always believed in the might of the pen. Not few but dozens of newsmen left Swat hours after the burial of their colleague. Many television channels moved their staff and equipment to safer places like Peshawar.

Now the world may not watch live coverage of peace marches initiated by Maulana Sufi Muhammad or funeral prayers for any slain journalist from the picturesque valley, currently in the throes of an unrelenting insurgency.

A senior local journalist introduced me to two of his colleagues and poignantly predicted: “These two soldiers of the pen will also be killed very soon, because they are fearless like Musa Khankhel, but you may not be able to telecast live their funeral.”

At least three local journalists working for prominent TV channels informed The News that they were also receiving life threats after the killing of Musa Khankhel. Unidentified callers told them that the technical staff of their channels coming from Lahore, Islamabad and Peshawar for the live coverage of the situation in Swat would not return alive if they were not sent back immediately.

Two technicians of Geo Television, with a van full of transmission equipment, were rounded up by Taliban in the Charbagh area the other day. The fighters initially declared them spies but later released them after the technicians promised that they would not venture again into to the area.

An emergency meeting was called at the Swat press club to discuss the new threats being faced by journalists. I tried my level best to convince more than 150 journalists present there that they should not leave the region. Maybe I was not aware of the problems faced by my local colleagues.

They claimed that the government was not in a position to provide them security. On the other hand, their high-ups always push them to dig out some exclusive stories and visuals. This urge for exclusives is not in the interest of the Taliban and the security forces.

As a result, the news people face problems from both sides. One journalist angrily said he could stay in the profession only if allowed to wield a heavy weapon. I discouraged him and said journalists should not carry weapons but should take other security measures. However, most of my colleagues demurred, with a young journalist showing me a pistol hidden under his jacket. He said he did not move without his gun.

One local newsman said at the meeting: “We request our non-local colleagues to leave Swat immediately because there is no government here and we cannot provide them security; they should come back when the situation gets better.”

Most of the participants readily supported this suggestion. Only one local journalist Shirinzada and a local newspaper editor Ghulam Farooq opposed this proposition and insisted, with their eyes welling up, that they were ready to sacrifice their lives like Musa Khankhel but would not stop speaking and writing the truth.

We had no choice but to respect the majority view. I also accepted the decision and agreed to quit Swat. But I must explain why the presence of an independent media does not sit well with the Taliban and the security forces.

The fighters generally consider electronic media as their enemy, thinking that all private television networks are in control of the government and project only destruction of schools. They accuse the electronic media of lacking the courage to show the schools occupied by the Army and used as bunkers. They allege sometimes local journalists provide information about their presence to security forces. In a retaliatory move, they have banned all cable TV channels in Swat.


On the other hand, security forces always blast the media for projecting the Taliban as heroes. The government, which has also discouraged the coverage of “terrorists” and its security personnel have no problem in negotiating and making deals with the “terrorists”. Some top officials in the security establishment always considered brave journalists like Musa Khankhel as “bad chaps”.

The slain reporter always refused to accept dictation from security officials. His bad temperament was another problem. Once a security official abused Musa Khankhel and he paid him in the same coin. It was the start of a much bigger problem. Musa was kidnapped and beaten up for two days. He was threatened not to make noises; otherwise, his family will be killed. The reporter shared the incident with me and some other colleagues. I wrote about the threats in an article published on the editorial pages of The News on January 13, 2009.

I wrote in the article: “I also know another journalist of Swat by the name of Musa Khankhel for many years. In the last few months, he has survived two assassination attempts. He told me that some elements within the security forces wanted to eliminate him physically due to his reporting.”


Hours before his murder, Musa Khankhel sent me a message that I must be careful while moving in the Kabal area. I asked him why he was worried even after the peace pact signed with Maulana Sufi Muhammad and the resultant 10-day ceasefire announced by the Taliban.

Khankhel replied: “You will watch the scenes of destruction in civilian, residential areas of Kabal. You will show live destroyed homes and mosques and people will equate your coverage with the bombing of Gaza by Israelis. You will become a security risk and they will kill you in the name of national interest. And the blame will be placed at Taliban’s door.”


He convinced me that my movement in the most dangerous area of Swat was not in the interest of those who always considered a free media as their enemy. I never underestimated his opinion and immediately left Kabal. Two hours after this conversation on telephone, I received the shocking news about the killing of a young man concerned about my security, but not his own. He saved me but I could not save him. Peace in Swat was a dream of Musa Khankhel, who is no more alive to fight for the cause. The situation in this valley of horror and terror is very complicated but I am still hopeful of peace despite the fact that there is a lot of distrust between the Taliban and the security forces.

The moving force behind the peace move is the common man. The ruling party in the North-West Frontier Province (NWFP) was formed by Bacha Khan, who belonged to the Indian National Congress, before the partition of the undivided sub-continent. The Awami National Party is a secular and liberal party that took a calculated risk by negotiating peace with Sufi Muhammad, who does not support democracy but backs peace in Swat.

The ANP leadership is aware that if there is peace in Swat, its government will have a chance to establish its writ. A provincial minister, Bashir Bilour, was able to visit Swat on February 18 after a along time. Two more ANP ministers visited the city a day later on February 19 to condole the death of Musa Khankhel.

Ministerial visits to the no-go area prove that the ANP will not be the only beneficiary of peace in the troubled valley, but the whole state of Pakistan will ultimately benefit from stability there. Peace alone will help the state establish its writ. The anti-democracy Sufi Muhammad accepted the importance of political forces by negotiating peace with them.

Indeed, this move is the victory of political forces because finally they will try to compel Taliban to surrender their arms. If Taliban agree to surrender, the provincial government will announce amnesty for them. More than 400 schools will reopen and more than 200 destroyed educational institutes can be rebuilt if the state enforces its writ. Thousands of girls can only go back to school only if the peace initiative succeeds.

Maulana Sufi Muhammad has assured the people of Swat that he will make efforts to reopen girls’ schools. One hopes that the cleric will not back out of his commitment.

Most people in Swat say that “peace and stability of our area is more important than winning the so-called war on terror”. They are angry with the reaction of the west and some liberal Pakistani analysts, who think that peace will benefit the Taliban alone. These analysts must take risk and visit Swat in the best interest of the truth. They will realise that there are only two options for the state to bring stability to Swat: one is peace and the other is war. The state cannot win this war because the use of guns and tanks will keep producing more Taliban. If there is no peace, there will be more anarchy. There will be no development. No schools, no newspapers and no television networks. More journalists will be killed. More journalists will leave Swat. I am leaving Swat today. I am committed to coming back. But I cannot come back if there is no peace. I can use my pen and camera only for reporting the truth if there is peace. Otherwise, I will become another Musa Khankhel and my pen will be silenced. Musa was killed by those who don’t want peace.

NWFP Information Minister Mian Iftikhar Hussain said Musa was killed by a “third force”. But he did not name the third force. Maybe he will expose it after peace returns to Swat.

Musa once asked me a question that if the British government could talk to the Irish Republican Army (IRA) and make peace with them, why the Pakistani rulers could not negotiate peace with Taliban. I know that UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown and US President Barrack Obama will not like this question to be answered. Maybe they will also say that Musa Khankhel was a Taliban sympathiser.
Read more...

Friday, 20 February 2009

Taliban killed Musa Khankhel. Will Sufi Muhammad provide Shar'i justice to Musa Khankhel's family?


Omens against peace in Swat...


As if in response to the Tehreek-e Nifaz-e Shariat-e Muhammadi (TNSM) leader Sufi Muhammad’s “peace march” from Mingora to Matta in Swat, a gang of Taliban kidnapped journalist Musa Khankhel on Wednesday and then rigged him with bullets and beheaded his dead corpse. The Sufi did not comment, but the act was clearly addressed to him as a message. Musa Khankhel was following the grand procession of sharia led by Sufi and exhorting all to support the accord. At the very least, Sufi should have condemned the act. But he didn’t. Now the media is outraged over the fourth journalist killed in Swat. Significantly, however, no one is ready to name the killers.

Sufi Muhammad has suddenly got more positive publicity than the Taliban ever did. Almost the whole of Swat is behind him and willing to walk in procession in the hope of finally achieving peace. The Sufi is the redeemer; and the tormentors, though unnamed, are the Taliban who control 80 percent of the region. This publicity may have been unbearable for the elements who hogged it for the last two years to the detriment of the state. Warlord Fazlullah may be the Sufi’s son-in-law but his patrons may want him to resist his growing influence.

A message from South Waziristan is ready to hand if you want to heed it. The building of the press club in Wana was blown up the same day Musa Khankhel was murdered. One can only call it a “symbolic” act meant to be a message to Swat because the press club was no longer in use after all the journalists had fled the headquarters of the Tehreek-e Taliban Pakistan (TTP) some time ago. The media, which the warlords relied on for publicity, is suddenly no longer in favour because its focus has shifted to Sufi Muhammad who is now negotiating the sharia accord (which he has signed with the NWFP government) with the Taliban.

The Taliban, who actually rule Swat, have announced a ten-day truce and have made public their reverence for the Sufi; but they could not have liked the sharia accord in which the charismatic Sufi has given away some of the fundamental positions taken by the Taliban’s central leadership. For instance, Baitullah Mehsud’s Waziristan Taliban fired another warning shot to the Taliban of Swat when they blew up two more girls’ schools in Bajaur on Wednesday. This again was ritualistic and symbolic because the girls no longer go to school in Bajaur. Given this atmosphere, it is going to be difficult for Sufi Muhammad to persuade his son-in-law to relent and let peace return to the valley.

Journalist Musa Khankhel has laid down his life for a big cause, the cause of giving the people of Swat their lives back, and the media must highlight his sacrifice in the shape of protest. And this protest should not shy away from naming the culprits now that Sufi Muhammad has polarised the region. The protest will give heart to the Swatis who now walk behind him but might later be intimidated into giving up. The battle is on and should not be abandoned because the people are now in a position to opt for someone who is not Taliban.

The world outside sees the Sufi factor as the beginning of a rift within the Taliban movement. The killers may all be savage men but a section of them is killing in the name of Allah and owes allegiance to Sufi Muhammad. This is the section that will find it hard to obey Fazlullah if he decides to reject the peace plan being pursued by his father-in-law. But the situation on the ground is still loaded against the Sufi because his sharia will have to unfold when the Taliban control the region; and the police and other bureaucracy have long fled the scene. (Daily Times)


Ataul Haq Qasmi
Read more...

Thursday, 19 February 2009

Geo TV reporter Musa Khan Khel had 32 bullet wounds.




Slain Pak TV reporter had 32 bullet wounds

Thursday, 19 February , 2009, 12:19

Islamabad: Thirty two bullets were pumped into TV reporter Musa Khan Khel in Pakistan's Swat Valley two days after Islamabad allowed the Taliban to impose Shariat (Islamic law) in the area, said Geo News executive editor Hamid Mir, adding a lot of radicals were unhappy with his coverage but "truth has to be reported".

Mir told a meeting of journalists: "They (the assailants) are mistaken, they cannot escape." He said that Musa Khan Khel's statements were recorded "2-3 times before his death. Truth has to be reported," he said.

Mir went on to say that several journalists had earlier been killed in the valley while performing their duty. Another journalist demanded that the government make arrangements for the protection of journalists in Swat and the killing was an assault on all journalists. He said that "there is no rule of law" in Swat.

Geo TVsaid unidentified gunmen shot dead Musa Khan Khel in Matta area of Swat Valley in the North West Frontier Province (NWFP). Khan Khel, who also worked for the English newspaper The News, was in the area to cover the talks between the local Taliban leader and a cleric, the News Network International (NNI) news agency reported.

No group claimed responsibility for the killing. Khan Khel is the second journalist to be shot dead in Swat valley in three months. Information Minister Sherry Rehman condemned Khan Khel's murder and vowed to bring the murderers to justice.



Who killed Musa Khan? The dangerous culture of "Breaking News" in Pakistani journalism. Will the owners of The Jang Group/Geo TV and other media tycoons accepts their responsibility?

Analysis by Abdul Haye Kakar at BBC Urdu dot com:



http://www.bbc.co.uk/urdu/pakistan/story/2009/02/090219_journo_analysis_as.shtml


...

Musa Khankhel — murder of a brave journalist


Thursday, February 19, 2009

By Rahimullah Yusufzai

PESHAWAR: Musa Khankhel used to tell his colleagues at The News International that he will be killed for his work as a journalist in Swat.

He was right.

On Wednesday, he was brutally murdered by unknown people while covering the vehicular procession of Maulana Sufi Mohammad, who is on a peace mission in Swat, from Mingora to Matta. The killers executed him after kidnapping him from Matta.

Musa Khankhel died with his boots on. He lost his life in the line of duty. He was the fourth journalist to be martyred in Swat since 2007 when violence first erupted in Pakistan’s most beautiful and peaceful valley. Sirajuddin, Aziz Khan and Qari Shoaib had been martyred earlier. However, Musa Khankhel’s murder was the first target killing of a Swati journalist.

His younger brother Isa Khankhel, who is also a journalist, was crying when he phoned this scribe to break the news of Musa Khankhel’s murder. He had lost not only a dear brother but also a professional colleague. They used to work together, helping each other at every step. Being older, Musa had taken Isa under his wings. Now Isa would have to cope for himself.

Friends and acquaintances used to joke with the two brothers while mentioning their names. Both had been named after prophets. Their names had a certain rhythm. One had to mention Musa and the name of Isa would come to mind. Like their names, Musa and Isa stuck together.

Musa Khankhel phoned this scribe on Wednesday morning to complain that the officials manning the military-run Swat Media Centre in Saidu Sharif had denied him permission to cover the press conference that senior provincial minister and ANP leader Bashir Bilour and other ministers were addressing. Isa too was denied the permission and he too called this writer with a request to take up the matter with the higher authorities. No reason was given for keeping the two brothers out of an event, which the government was keen to publicise. The ministers had ventured to travel to Swat after a while in a bid to show that the valley was returning to normalcy after the announcement of Nizam-e-Adl Regulation.

It wasn’t the first time that Musa Khankhel had encountered problems in his dealings with the security forces and other stakeholders in Swat. Last year, he was manhandled by the men in uniform at the Circuit House in Saidu Sharif. Obviously, they weren’t happy with the reporting of the happenings in Swat by the headstrong Musa Khankhel.

He was a fearless man. All advice to him to take care of his security fell on deaf ears. Journalism for him was an addiction. He was so much committed to the profession that he used to live in his office and stay awake at night to transmit news of the latest happenings to his media organisation.

Musa Khankhel made many enemies during the course of his journalistic career. Anyone among them could have got him eliminated. The violence that affected every section of the population in Swat also took its toll on journalists. His family hasn’t blamed anyone for Musa Khankhel’s murder and, therefore, it would be unfair to name suspects or speculate about the killers. Though fair and proper investigations into his murder aren’t possible in Swat nowadays, one would expect the government to do its bit to expose and punish the murderers.

Just when everyone thought peace was finally returning to Swat, the first murder after the enforcement of the ceasefire was that of a journalist. And it happened to be Musa Khankhel, who undoubtedly was one of the most courageous reporters in Swat. (The News)

.....

The curse of the breaking news culture and the never-ending greed of our media tycoons may also be taken into account in this and other sad incidents. I was reading this news item today, in which a journalist rep (Raiz Khan):

".... criticised the owners of media organisations, saying that the organisations did not arrange any training for journalists working in the conflict zone. Let alone their training, even appointment letters are not provided to the media men, he lamented. He said the organisations should immediately issue appointment letters to all the journalists working in the conflict zones, provide them proper salaries, give them life jackets, arrange life insurance for them and above all ensure a proper training for them."

http://www.thenews.com.pk/daily_detail.asp?id=164889
Read more...

Journalist Imtiaz Alam attacked in Lahore: The price of writing/speaking against Taliban and their sympathizers....

SAFMA secretary general Imtiaz Alam attacked

* Assault followed by threatening phone call
* Veteran journalist says will not stop speaking out against terror

By Adnan Lodhi


LAHORE: Unidentified men attacked senior journalist Imtiaz Alam late on Wednesday.

Imtiaz Alam, who is the secretary general of South Asian Free Media Association (SAFMA), said he was travelling to his house in Doctor’s Colony at about 11pm when four men attacked his car with batons. Alam was injured when a shattered window glass struck his arm.

After battering the vehicle for several minutes, the bearded men clad in shalwar kamiz fled on their motorcycles. Alam said the men were aged between 25 and 30.

His wife, Dr Nusrat Habib, told Daily Times she heard the men thrashing the car – not too far away from the house. She said she saw the men as they fled.

Alam said he received a telephone call from a cell phone (0323 4580562) about 45 minutes later that warned him of ‘dire consequences’ if he told anyone about the attack.

A local resident said the six men had been hiding in the street waiting for the car to approach. Four of them attacked the vehicle and two looked on, he said.

Shadman Station House Officer Hamad Akhtar said an FIR had been registered and a probe would begin soon.

The veteran journalist said the ‘cowardly act’ was meant to stop him from speaking out against terrorism, but vowed to continue to raise his voice.

Daily Times Editor-in-Chief Najam Sethi said this was an act of terrorism and an attack on independent media. He urged the democratic government to take the attack on Alam seriously.


Read more...